Skip to main content

Security report for vatican.va

The Holy See · Government · Vatican City

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.vatican.va is the official online presence of the Holy See, providing authoritative access to papal teachings, Catholic Church documents, and information about the Roman Curia and liturgical celebrations. It serves a global audience interested in Catholicism, including clergy, researchers, and the general public. The site is multilingual and well-structured, reflecting the institutional nature of the Vatican. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Swiper.js, and Google Tag Manager, and is likely powered by Adobe Experience Manager CMS. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. No contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosure is found. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with high business credibility but room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. No adult or questionable content is present, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vatican.va. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vatican.va

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention vatican.va, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
342
Employees
0
Customers
301
Third parties
41
Weak passwords
21%

11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for vatican.va.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Holy See operates as a sovereign entity and religious institution, with this website serving as its official digital communication channel. It holds a unique market position as the central authority of the Catholic Church worldwide. The business model is informational and institutional, focusing on disseminating religious teachings, official documents, and news. Revenue streams are not applicable in the traditional sense, as the entity is non-commercial. The target customers are global Catholics, scholars, and those interested in Vatican affairs. The site links to official Vatican news and press offices, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem within Vatican media. Growth indicators include multilingual content and event calendars for upcoming papal activities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible security flaws in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager is implemented asynchronously, reducing performance impact. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a best practice for institutional websites. Overall, the site is secure but could enhance its security culture and compliance by publishing relevant policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy accessible from the homepage footer.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  5. Enhance transparency by including terms of service and data protection officer contact details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Holy See
Description
Official website of the Holy See providing access to the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs, fundamental Catholic texts in multiple languages, documents of the Roman Curia, and information about liturgical celebrations and the College of Cardinals.
Key services
Access to papal documents and teachings, Event calendar and news updates, Information on Roman Curia and Catholic institutions, Multilingual content delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager asynchronously
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Vatican website with authoritative content on Catholicism and Vatican affairs.
  2. Multilingual support with clear navigation and search functionality.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. Lack of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies reduces compliance posture.
  5. No explicit contact or security incident reporting information found.
  6. Good content quality and professional presentation.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical foundation using Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. The site uses canonical URLs and Open Graph metadata for SEO and social sharing. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by adding security headers and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +15Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 58/100 +10Medium25 findingsView report
  3. 48/100High25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vatican.va. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vatican.va.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.