Skip to main content

Security report for vasqueparis2024.fr

Aerophile · Government · France

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website vasqueparis2024.fr represents a public event installation called La Vasque, associated with the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. It is operated by Aerophile and features partnerships with governmental and cultural institutions such as the Prefecture of Île-de-France, EDF, the Louvre, and the City of Paris. The event is scheduled for summer 2025 at the Jardin des Tuileries, targeting general public visitors and Olympic enthusiasts. The business model revolves around event hosting and public engagement with sponsorship support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including UIkit and jQuery. It uses HTTPS with a reputable hosting provider (Infomaniak Network SA) and implements cookie consent management via tarteaucitron. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO and accessibility basics. Analytics are handled via Google Analytics (GA4) with moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain is newly registered in April 2025, which is unusual given the event dates but does not indicate malicious intent. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a niche event tied to the Paris 2024 Olympics. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving direct contact information for better transparency and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vasqueparis2024.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a niche event operator focused on the Paris 2024 Olympics, leveraging partnerships with government and cultural institutions to enhance credibility and reach. The business model is event-driven with sponsorship and public engagement as revenue streams. The target audience includes local residents, tourists, and Olympic fans. The partnership ecosystem is strong, involving official government and cultural entities. Growth indicators include the use of official Olympic branding and a dedicated website. The company Aerophile is the parent entity, specializing in balloon-based attractions. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a high trust level.

Security posture

The security maturity is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed properly. The site uses a honeypot plugin to reduce spam in contact forms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating a gap in formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are lacking.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Expand contact information to include general support and security contacts beyond press inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aerophile
Description
La Vasque is an event installation related to the Olympic and Paralympic Games of Paris 2024, presented at Jardin des Tuileries from June to September 2025. It is a public attraction involving a large balloon (La Vasque) with partners including governmental and cultural institutions.
Key services
Public exhibition of La Vasque balloon, Event hosting, Cultural and governmental partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, UIkit, Tarteaucitron (cookie consent), Google Analytics (GA4)
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via tarteaucitron
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of honeypot plugin for contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (GA4)
Marketing tools
Google Translate API
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on a public event related to Paris 2024 Olympics.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with user consent mechanisms.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. Limited direct contact information; only press contact form found.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Domain registration timing is unusual but not necessarily suspicious.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a custom theme and UIkit framework for UI components. It loads jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for interactivity and cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable European hosting provider. Performance is moderate with optimized images (including WebP) and responsive design. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and alt attributes. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. The site uses Google Analytics (GA4) for traffic analysis and Google Translate API for dynamic translation of some content. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and formal security documentation are areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vasqueparis2024.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vasqueparis2024.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.