Skip to main content

Security report for vasekromeriz.cz

Město Kroměříž · Government · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

66/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Vaše Kroměříž' is a government-run participatory budgeting platform for the city of Kroměříž, Czech Republic. It enables residents to propose, discuss, and vote on community improvement projects funded by a dedicated city budget. The platform is designed to foster civic engagement and transparency in local government spending. The site provides detailed information about the phases, rules, and voting system, including secure two-factor authentication for voting. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with UIkit and jQuery, hosted by Wedos, and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While HTTPS is properly implemented, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies and some security headers, which are areas for improvement. Contact information is clearly provided with official city emails and phone numbers, enhancing trust. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and serves its civic purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vasekromeriz.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform positions itself as a local government service facilitating participatory budgeting, a growing trend in civic engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing by the city and a clear, structured process for citizen involvement. The business model is government-funded, focusing on community development rather than revenue generation. Target customers are local residents and community groups. The site shows signs of strategic planning with phased project submission and voting timelines. Partnerships with municipal departments are evident, and the platform leverages existing digital tools like Mobilní rozhlas for voting. Growth potential depends on citizen adoption and successful project implementations. The ecosystem includes municipal investment and project management offices, indicating integrated operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and a two-factor authentication mechanism for voting, which mitigates vote manipulation risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies is found, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of WordPress and common plugins necessitates regular updates to avoid known vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking explicit cookie consent and privacy policy documentation. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a government informational site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance fully.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen web security.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Kroměříž
Description
Participatory budgeting platform for the city of Kroměříž, enabling citizens to propose and vote on community improvement projects funded by the city budget.
Key services
Project proposal submission, Public voting system, Information dissemination about participatory budgeting, Contact and support for project submitters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, UIkit, SmartMenus, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of two-factor verification for voting via SMS code
  • Secure file upload restrictions on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government initiative for participatory budgeting in Kroměříž.
  2. Content is comprehensive about the process, rules, and phases of participatory budgeting.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with official city emails and phone numbers.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies are explicitly found on the site.
  5. Security practices include HTTPS and two-factor authentication for voting.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and UIkit framework.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Domain registration is recent but consistent with the project launch.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using version 6.8.1, enhanced with UIkit for UI components and SmartMenus for navigation. It loads Google Fonts and uses Google Analytics via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site is hosted by Wedos, a Czech hosting provider, with domain registration consistent with the business purpose. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. The site uses secure HTTPS connections but lacks advanced security headers. The contact form uses Contact Form 7 plugin with file upload fields restricted by size and type, indicating some security awareness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vasekromeriz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vasekromeriz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.