Skip to main content

Security report for varify.io

Varify.io - A/B Testing Platform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Varify.io is a technology company offering a SaaS platform for unlimited A/B testing and dynamic website optimization at a fixed monthly price. The platform targets online marketers, agencies, and businesses seeking cost-effective and easy-to-use testing solutions. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates multiple third-party services such as Cookiebot for consent management, New Relic for performance monitoring, and various marketing and analytics tools. While the site demonstrates excellent content quality, professional design, and good SEO, it lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS configurations, which significantly impact its security posture. The presence of comprehensive cookie and privacy policies indicates good privacy compliance, but no explicit security or incident response policies were found. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but requires urgent improvements in its SSL/TLS security to enhance user trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of varify.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching varify.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention varify.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for varify.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Varify.io positions itself as a cost-effective alternative to traditional A/B testing platforms by offering unlimited traffic and experiments for a fixed price. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, leveraging integrations with popular analytics and marketing platforms to provide seamless evaluation and optimization. The company has a growing user base of over 2,700 teams worldwide and maintains a strong online presence with multilingual support and active social media channels. Partnerships with Calendly, Hubspot, New Relic, and Cookiebot enhance its service offerings and customer engagement. The platform's focus on GDPR compliance and data protection aligns with European market requirements, supporting its credibility and market acceptance.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of enabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No HTTP security headers were detected, and advanced security features like HSTS and OCSP stapling are not implemented. However, the use of SPF and DMARC records for email protection and the absence of subdomain takeover vulnerabilities are positive indicators. The site employs Cookiebot for cookie consent management, supporting privacy compliance. The lack of visible security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of security headers are critical to improving the site's security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect data in transit.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and disable outdated protocols to enhance security.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Ensure OCSP stapling is enabled for efficient certificate revocation checking.
  5. Publish clear security and incident response policies, including dedicated contact channels.
  6. Maintain and regularly update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Enhance transparency by providing detailed data protection officer contact information.
  8. Continue leveraging consent management tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance.
  9. Optimize website performance to improve user experience and reduce load times.
  10. Regularly audit and monitor security posture to detect and mitigate emerging threats.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Ultimate Member plugin for user management. It integrates multiple third-party services including Cookiebot for cookie consent, New Relic for performance monitoring, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and various marketing pixels from Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Hubspot. The hosting infrastructure includes Amazon AWS IP with Cloudflare DNS services. Despite a rich technology stack, the site suffers from slow load times (17.7 seconds) and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant technical risk. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Opportunities exist to improve performance, security configurations, and reduce technical debt by updating SSL/TLS and optimizing resource loading.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +14Low24 findingsView report
  2. 67/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with varify.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review varify.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.