Skip to main content

Security report for varify.io

Varify GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Varify GmbH operates Varify.io, a specialized SaaS platform offering A/B testing services without traffic limits, targeting businesses and digital marketers aiming to optimize their digital presence. The company is positioned as a niche player in the technology sector, founded in 2016 and based in Germany. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business messaging and user-friendly navigation. Technically, the site leverages WordPress with Elementor, Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as PostHog, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers and DNSSEC are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure and trustworthy business presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of varify.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching varify.io

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention varify.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12
Employees
0
Customers
12
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for varify.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Varify GmbH's market positioning focuses on providing an unlimited traffic A/B testing platform, differentiating itself from competitors with traffic-unrestricted experimentation capabilities. The SaaS business model targets digital marketers and businesses seeking conversion optimization tools. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and privacy compliance, indicating a customer-centric approach. Partnerships with marketing and analytics providers enhance its ecosystem. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. Growth potential is supported by modern technology adoption and transparent business practices.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be a compliance gap. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a strong data protection culture. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Varify GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Varify GmbH
Description
Varify.io offers an A/B testing platform designed without traffic limits, enabling businesses to optimize their websites and digital products through experimentation.
Key services
A/B Testing Platform, Experimentation Tools, Conversion Optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare (DNS and CDN), New Relic (performance monitoring), Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, reCAPTCHA, PostHog (analytics), Cookiebot (cookie consent), Elementor (WordPress page builder), WordPress CMS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
PostHog, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot (js.hs-scripts.com), Storylane
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  2. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. Website built on WordPress with Elementor page builder.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Clear business focus on A/B testing SaaS platform.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, hosted behind Cloudflare CDN and DNS services. It integrates multiple third-party services including New Relic for performance monitoring, Google Tag Manager, PostHog for analytics, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and HubSpot for marketing automation. The site is optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good performance and SEO practices. The technology stack is modern and well-maintained, though some technical improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers would enhance overall robustness. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100 +21Low24 findingsView report
  2. 60/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with varify.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review varify.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.