Skip to main content

Security report for vanagkalns.lv

Slēpošanas un ūdenstūrisma klubs "VANAGKALNS" · Other · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slēpošanas un ūdenstūrisma klubs "VANAGKALNS" is a small local recreational club based in Latvia, focusing on skiing and water tourism activities. The website provides information about club events, ski rentals, and sauna services, targeting local community members and tourists interested in outdoor recreational activities. The site uses WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the content quality is basic and lacks comprehensive business and privacy information. Security posture is limited with no detected security headers or published security policies, and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, restricting trust verification. Overall, the site is accessible, safe for general audiences, but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vanagkalns.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in the recreational sector, organizing events like the Vanagkalna Run Festival and offering services such as ski rental and sauna. Its business model appears membership or community-based with event-driven revenue streams. The website's market position is local and niche, serving a specific geographic and interest group. The absence of detailed business registrations or certifications limits deeper business intelligence. The partnership ecosystem is minimal with only a YouTube channel linked. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from canonical URLs), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to enhance headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is robust and enforced site-wide.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and incident response emails.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slēpošanas un ūdenstūrisma klubs "VANAGKALNS"
Description
Slēpošanas un ūdenstūrisma klubs "VANAGKALNS" is a club focused on skiing and water tourism activities. The website mentions events such as Vanagkalna Run Festival 2025 and services like ski rental and sauna.
Key services
Skiing, Water tourism, Ski rental, Event organization, Sauna services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Astra theme, Elementor, Premium Addons for Elementor, MediaElement.js, YouTube iframe API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress Stats (stats.wp.com)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local recreational club site with basic content and services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes emails and phone numbers in page content but no dedicated contact form detected.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  6. No advanced security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is accessible.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
  9. SEO optimization is present via Yoast plugin but content quality is basic.
  10. No evident certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supplemented by the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It loads external resources from Google Fonts, YouTube, and WordPress.org emoji assets. Performance appears moderate with standard modern web technologies. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or hosting provider details. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance features. Opportunities exist to modernize security and privacy implementations to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vanagkalns.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vanagkalns.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.