Skip to main content

Security report for van-geenen.com

Van Geenen · Manufacturing · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Van Geenen is a Dutch metal finishing company specializing in high-tech, esthetic, and industrial metal processing solutions. The company positions itself as a comprehensive partner offering services such as polishing, grinding, coating, and cleanroom assembly. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and clear navigation, targeting business clients in manufacturing sectors. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks including Alpine.js and Livewire, integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, and is hosted on TransIP infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. WHOIS data shows inconsistencies with a future domain creation date, which may be a data anomaly but slightly impacts trust. Overall, the website is credible, well-maintained, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching van-geenen.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Van Geenen operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on metal finishing services for industrial, high-tech, and esthetic applications. Their business model is B2B, providing end-to-end finishing solutions including polishing, grinding, coating, and cleanroom services. The company emphasizes quality, efficiency, and personalized solutions, supported by a portfolio of projects and clear sector-specific offerings. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a strong brand presence in the Netherlands. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad digital marketing. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed beyond website references. The company appears to be relatively new or recently rebranded based on domain age, but claims generational expertise.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, limiting transparency in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Analytics and tracking are implemented responsibly with user consent. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in DNS security and security policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS data for accuracy and update registrant information to improve trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Van Geenen
Description
Van Geenen is jouw complete partner in metaalbewerking voor hightech, esthetische én industriële toepassingen. We denken niet in producten, maar in oplossingen.
Key services
metal finishing, polishing, grinding, cleanroom cleaning and packaging, cleanroom assembly, coating for stainless steel parts, ViwateQ® finishing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Livewire, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Livewire
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch with multilingual support.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Modern frontend technologies and analytics tools are used.
  7. WHOIS data contains unusual future creation date, which is suspicious but may be a data error.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Alpine.js for interactivity and Livewire for reactive components, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management, reflecting compliance and marketing maturity. The site is hosted on TransIP, a reputable Dutch hosting provider. Performance appears optimized with preloading of CSS and JavaScript modules. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with van-geenen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review van-geenen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.