Skip to main content

Security report for valkyrie.com

Valkyrie Enterprises · Government · United States

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Valkyrie Enterprises is a defense contractor based in Virginia Beach, Virginia, specializing in mission-ready support services for the Department of Defense, aerospace, and commercial clients. Established in 2007, the company offers a range of services including systems engineering, modeling and simulation, maritime modernization, readiness and sustainment, critical communications, and electronic products. The website reflects a professional presence with consistent branding and a clear focus on its target audience in the government and defense sectors. Technically, the site is built on the Wix platform utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks such as React, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant security concern. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in compliance with data protection regulations. Social media presence is active, providing additional trust signals. Overall, while the business appears credible and established, the website's security posture and privacy compliance require urgent improvements to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching valkyrie.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized defense contractor with a medium-sized operational scale, targeting government and aerospace sectors. Its business model revolves around providing readiness, sustainment, and modernization services, supported by a comprehensive product portfolio. The website's structure and content suggest a focus on professional clients with an emphasis on technical capabilities. The use of Office365 for email and presence on major social platforms indicates a mature digital footprint. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit engagement and trust from potential clients. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or parent companies listed, suggesting independent operation. The market position is stable with a history since 2007, but digital maturity could be enhanced.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS and X-Content-Type-Options are present, the absence of HTTPS severely undermines the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response policies, or security certifications was found. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. These gaps represent significant risks, especially given the company's involvement in defense contracting. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and implementation of comprehensive privacy and security policies are recommended to mitigate these risks.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security issues (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Enhance website accessibility and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to prevent vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Wix platform, leveraging React and various Wix-specific components and widgets such as Wix Pro Gallery, Wix Stores, and Wix Blog. The DNS setup uses AWS Route53 name servers and Office365 for email services. The site employs modern JavaScript libraries and includes performance optimizations like lazy loading and responsive images. However, the SSL configuration is absent, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a critical technical deficiency. The site is not fully mobile responsive and lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and structured data but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a Wix-based site but requires security enhancements and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with valkyrie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review valkyrie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.