Skip to main content

Security report for vac.lv

Vienotais apgādes centrs SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vienotais Apgādes Centrs (VAC) is a Latvian company specializing in agricultural supplies and equipment, targeting livestock farming sectors such as cattle, calves, horses, pigs, sheep, and poultry. The company offers a broad range of products including plastic containers, farming equipment, and repair services, positioning itself as a regional supplier with established partnerships. The website reflects a medium-sized business with a clear focus on B2B and B2C sales within Latvia. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies such as React and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The presence of Google Maps API indicates location services for customer convenience. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected, and no privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, but lacks some critical compliance documentation and security hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and publishing incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vac.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

VAC operates in the agricultural manufacturing and retail sector, serving farms and livestock businesses in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive product catalog, including plastic containers and livestock equipment, combined with service offerings such as consultations and equipment repair. The company maintains partnerships with recognized brands, as evidenced by linked catalogs and partner logos. The business model is a hybrid of direct sales and service provision, targeting agricultural enterprises and individual farmers. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with product categorization and active marketing via Google services. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct customer engagement rather than broad social media marketing. The company appears stable with a medium size and regional market focus.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication, but the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are apparent, the security posture would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen website security against common attacks.
  3. Publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly monitor and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Vienotais apgādes centrs SIA
Registration number
VRN 40003257516
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vienotais apgādes centrs SIA
Description
Lopkopības preces govīm, teļiem, zirgiem, cūkām, aitām, mājputniem, inventārs un tehnika fermām, iekārtu remonts, plastmasas trauku un spaiņu tirdzniecība
Key services
Sale of plastic containers and buckets, Livestock farming equipment, Consultations and service, Equipment repair, Spare parts supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL scheme

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Contact information is clearly presented
  5. Use of modern web technologies including React and Google services
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  8. Multiple partner logos and catalogs linked
  9. No social media links explicitly found in HTML
  10. No security or incident response contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses React as its primary front-end framework, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. Integration with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager provides robust analytics and marketing capabilities. The use of Google Maps API enhances user experience by providing location services. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization in accessibility and SEO. The absence of security headers and compliance documentation suggests technical debt in security and privacy implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires enhancements in security and compliance areas to reduce business risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vac.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vac.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.