U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs · Government · United States
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs operates VA.gov as the official digital portal for Veterans, service members, and their families to access a wide range of benefits and health care services. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for applying, managing, and learning about VA benefits including health care, disability compensation, education, employment, housing, life insurance, and burial services. It holds a strong market position as the primary federal agency website dedicated to Veterans affairs. Technically, VA.gov employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Web Components, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site is built on Drupal CMS and follows the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) for accessibility and responsive design, delivering excellent performance and user experience across devices. SEO and accessibility are well implemented, with clear navigation and professional branding. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as nonce attributes in scripts and privacy policy transparency. However, it lacks an explicit cookie consent mechanism and a published vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Incident response contact details are not explicitly provided. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with these additions. The website is highly trustworthy, with consistent WHOIS data confirming its legitimacy as a U.S. government domain. It contains no adult or questionable content and targets a general audience of Veterans and related stakeholders. The site integrates analytics and feedback tools responsibly, maintaining good privacy compliance. Strategically, VA.gov is a critical government digital service with excellent content quality and technical maturity. Enhancements in privacy consent and vulnerability disclosure would further strengthen user trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention va.gov, from OffSeq Breach.
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for va.gov.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with va.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review va.gov.