Skip to main content

Security report for uzeninypribram.cz

Uzeniny Příbram, a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uzeniny Příbram, a.s. is a Czech meat processing company operating modernized production plants in Příbram and Zábřeh na Moravě, focusing on pork and beef slaughtering and producing high-quality meat products including hams and low sodium specialties. The website presents basic company information and product branding targeted at a general audience in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is HTTPS enabled and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks a privacy policy and explicit contact information on the homepage. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and transparency. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness and raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is functional but basic in content quality and technical sophistication.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of uzeninypribram.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uzeninypribram.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector specializing in meat products with a regional market focus. Its business model centers on production and distribution of pork and beef products with emphasis on quality and health-conscious options. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with modernized facilities but lacks detailed business data such as founding year or parent company. The absence of contact details and privacy policy on the website limits customer engagement and trust signals. Marketing efforts include use of Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics, suggesting some digital marketing maturity. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency and richer content to strengthen market position and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, no security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of WHOIS data and registrant transparency is a notable risk factor. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact channels for incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response policy and security contact details to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uzeniny Příbram, a.s.
Description
Uzeniny Příbram, a.s. is a meat processing company operating production plants in Příbram and Zábřeh na Moravě, specializing in pork and beef slaughtering and production of meat products including high-standard hams and low sodium products.
Key services
Meat processing, Pork and beef slaughtering, Production of hams and meat specialties
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie policy with consent mechanism is present.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage HTML.
  5. Site uses standard marketing and analytics scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel).
  6. Content is in Czech language, targeting local/regional audience.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage HTML.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Site is HTTPS enabled.
  10. Content is safe and business-focused on meat production.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack including Google Fonts for typography, Google Tag Manager for analytics management, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and retargeting. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating basic SSL configuration. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with empty meta keywords and description tags. The site structure is straightforward but could benefit from enhanced semantic markup and richer metadata. No forms or interactive elements were found on the homepage, limiting data collection capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 53/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uzeninypribram.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uzeninypribram.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.