Skip to main content

Security report for uwr.de

Deutsches Unwetterradar · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Deutsches Unwetterradar (uwr.de) is a specialized weather alert service focused on providing real-time severe weather warnings for Germany. The website offers detailed weather radar, news, and subscription-based SMS and email alerts for multiple locations. It targets the general public in Germany who require timely and accurate weather warnings. The business model is subscription-based with transparent pricing and premium features such as ad-free experience and multi-location alerts. The site also links to partner weather alert services in neighboring European countries, indicating a regional network presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including OpenLayers for mapping, Handlebars.js for templating, and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Analytics (both Universal and GA4) and Facebook SDK for user tracking and marketing. The site is hosted with domain protection via MarkMonitor, ensuring domain security and legitimacy. Performance and mobile optimization are good, with clear navigation and professional design. From a security standpoint, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. While explicit security headers are not fully visible in the provided data, the site follows best practices such as secure login forms and no exposed sensitive data. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Privacy policies and terms of service are comprehensive and accessible. Overall, uwr.de presents a trustworthy, professional, and user-focused weather alert platform with a solid technical foundation and compliance posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and providing direct company contact details to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uwr.de

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uwr.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uwr.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche severe weather alert market in Germany, leveraging subscription revenue from SMS and email alerts. Its competitive advantage lies in timely, localized warnings and a multi-location subscription model. The partnership ecosystem extends across several European countries, enhancing market reach. The business targets individuals and organizations needing precise weather information for safety and planning. Growth indicators include mobile app availability and active content updates. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear pricing and service descriptions, supporting customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The absence of explicit security headers suggests room for improvement. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found. Login forms are present but require verification for CSRF and brute force protections. The use of third-party analytics and social SDKs introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not published, indicating a potential compliance gap. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or abuse email to improve security transparency and compliance.
  3. Add CSRF tokens and rate limiting to login forms to prevent abuse.
  4. Provide direct company contact information such as phone or email for customer support and trust building.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Deutsches Unwetterradar
Description
Aktuellste Unwettersituation für Deutschland mit punktgenauen Unwetterwarnungen per SMS und E-Mail.
Key services
Real-time severe weather warnings, Weather radar and maps, SMS and email alert subscriptions, Mobile app for weather alerts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
OpenLayers (ol.Map), Handlebars.js, Google Analytics (UA and GA4), Consentmanager cookie consent, Bootstrap (navbar, modal dialogs), SVG icons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web desktop, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Login forms with password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (Universal Analytics and GA4), Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Consentmanager cookie consent, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides real-time severe weather warnings for Germany.
  2. Subscription model with clear pricing and benefits.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in German.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible; contact via web form.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Integration with Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking.
  9. Domain uses professional domain protection services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with OpenLayers for interactive maps, Handlebars.js for client-side templating, and Bootstrap for responsive UI components. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted with MarkMonitor domain protection, indicating professional domain management. Performance is moderate with some caching for map previews. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile app promotion. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation enhancements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be enhanced with improved security headers and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uwr.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uwr.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.