Skip to main content

Security report for usu.com

USU · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

USU is a technology company specializing in IT service management, IT asset management, and AI-driven digital transformation solutions. The company positions itself as a leader in IT financial management and software asset management, serving enterprise clients with a comprehensive suite of products and services. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and rich in content, targeting IT organizations and enterprises seeking to optimize IT costs, manage risks, and leverage AI technologies. Technically, the site is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual for a large enterprise and may warrant further verification. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with a solid security and privacy compliance foundation, though improvements in transparency and WHOIS data availability are recommended.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of usu.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching usu.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention usu.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
622
Employees
0
Customers
601
Third parties
21
Weak passwords
15%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for usu.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

USU operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT service management and cloud optimization. Its business model is B2B, providing software and managed services to large enterprises. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a marketplace and training portals to extend its ecosystem. Market positioning is strong, supported by Gartner and Forrester recognitions and notable customers like Bosch. The company targets IT departments and financial operations teams within enterprises, emphasizing cost control, risk management, and AI utilization. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement through detailed product information and resource offerings. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a controlled communication approach via contact forms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements multiple security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. Consent management for cookies is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance privacy policy details with clear data retention and processing information.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit security headers and consent mechanisms to ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
USU
Description
USU optimizes IT and elevates service through cost control, risk management, and AI-driven solutions for efficient cloud and service management.
Key services
IT Service Management, IT Asset Management, Customer Service Knowledge Management, IT Monitoring, FinOps, SaaS Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot CMS, jQuery, Cookiefirst Consent Management, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Cookiefirst Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on IT service management and digital transformation.
  3. Multiple language options available (EN, DE, FR, IT).
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a commercial domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses HubSpot CMS with a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and various marketing and analytics scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site integrates multiple external domains for marketing and service delivery, including LinkedIn, Facebook, and Google services. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence but could benefit from performance optimization audits and enhanced security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with usu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review usu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.