Skip to main content

Security report for uponor.com

Uponor Suomi Oy · Manufacturing · Finland

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uponor Suomi Oy is a leading international company specializing in building and infrastructure water transport solutions. The company offers a wide range of products and services including building technology, infrastructure products, project services, and customer support. It operates under the parent company Georg Fischer (GF) Group and targets professionals in construction, infrastructure planning, and homeowners. The website is well-designed, content-rich, and provides comprehensive information about products, services, and corporate policies. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like React and Kentico CMS, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools. However, a critical security issue is the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate, exposing users to risks. Security headers are well implemented, but the lack of HTTPS significantly lowers the security posture. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but urgently needs to address its SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uponor.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Uponor holds a strong market position as a manufacturer and service provider in the building and infrastructure sectors, focusing on water management systems. Its business model combines product manufacturing with value-added services such as project support and e-learning. The company leverages its parent company's resources and maintains a broad international presence with localized content for multiple countries. The website reflects a mature digital presence with extensive product catalogs, customer support, and sustainability initiatives. Partnerships with Georg Fischer and related subsidiaries enhance its market reach. The company demonstrates commitment to sustainability and innovation, as evidenced by awards and dedicated product lines. The target audience includes construction professionals, infrastructure planners, and homeowners seeking reliable water transport solutions.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with several best practices in place, including security headers like HSTS, CSP (report-only), X-Frame-Options, and XSS protection. Cookies are set with HttpOnly and Secure flags. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose the site and its users to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The lack of HSTS enforcement and OCSP stapling further weakens the security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, indicating potential gaps in security transparency. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the site needs urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to elevate its security stance.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable all insecure protocols to protect data in transit.
  3. Enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Move Content-Security-Policy from report-only to enforce mode to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  5. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  6. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  8. Maintain consistent updates to security headers and monitor for emerging threats.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Uponor Suomi Oy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React 16.14.0 and Kentico CMS, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics CMP for analytics and cookie consent management. The site is multilingual with extensive localized content and structured navigation. Performance data is unavailable, but the site appears optimized for mobile and accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the lack of SSL/TLS severely impacts the technical security and trustworthiness. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, analytics, advertising, and social media integrations, which are managed with appropriate content security policies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but requires critical security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uponor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uponor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.