Skip to main content

Security report for upnetic.com

Tarkenton Companies · Other · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Upnetic, a brand under Tarkenton Companies, offers a comprehensive platform tailored for startups, sole proprietors, and small businesses. Their services encompass consulting, legal assistance, digital marketing analysis, CRM, website building, and business planning tools, positioning them as a one-stop solution for small business growth and management. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and contact information, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework, enhanced by modern JavaScript libraries and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as New Relic, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Crazy Egg. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy, consistent with the WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. From a security standpoint, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating attention to privacy compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, and DNSSEC is not enabled, suggesting areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, Upnetic demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with good privacy compliance and user experience. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and DNS security could further strengthen their posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upnetic.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Upnetic operates in the small business services sector, focusing on providing integrated tools and expert consulting to empower small enterprises. Their business model combines subscription-based software offerings with consulting and legal services, targeting startups and sole proprietors. The company benefits from a clear market niche with limited direct competition offering such a broad service suite. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees, consulting charges, and possibly affiliate or partner services. The presence of mobile apps and digital marketing tools indicates a modern approach to customer engagement. Partnerships with app stores and use of third-party analytics suggest a well-established digital ecosystem. The company’s transparent contact information and privacy policies enhance customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. The absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in security maturity. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy and security considerations, though no direct vulnerabilities were identified. Security headers were not explicitly detected in the provided data, which could be an area for enhancement. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but would benefit from formalizing security policies and improving DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tarkenton Companies
Description
Upnetic provides an all-in-one platform for startups, sole proprietors, and small businesses offering consulting, legal services, digital marketing analysis, website building, CRM with email marketing, business planning software, and learning resources.
Key services
Small Business Consulting Services, Google Business Profile Optimization, Legal Services, Digital Marketing Analyzer, Website Builder, Legal Forms, Comprehensive Business Assessment, CRM with Email Marketing, Business Plan Software, Learning Lab
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, New Relic Browser Monitoring, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Crazy Egg
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers (though specific headers not detected in provided data)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Crazy Egg
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Crazy Egg
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism implemented
  3. Clear contact information with company email and phone number
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with tracking pixels
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with GoDaddy without privacy protection
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and modern JavaScript libraries
  8. Good mobile optimization and user experience
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework, utilizing jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend enhancements. It integrates advanced monitoring and analytics tools including New Relic Browser, Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Crazy Egg, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Hosting is inferred to be with GoDaddy based on WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses a cookie consent banner powered by OneTrust, supporting privacy compliance. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and improving security headers would modernize the security posture further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upnetic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upnetic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.