Skip to main content

Security report for upcz.cz

Up Česká republika s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Up Česká republika s.r.o. operates a professional website focused on providing modern employee benefits solutions in the Czech Republic. The company positions itself as a key player in the employee benefits market, targeting businesses seeking to improve workplace relations and employee engagement. The website content is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for SEO, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Mluvii for customer interaction, indicating a solid infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is supported by a detailed cookie consent mechanism, but a formal privacy policy page was not detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and business-oriented with no adult or questionable content. The lack of WHOIS data limits transparency but does not raise immediate concerns. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and security policies, enhancing accessibility, and adding direct contact information for improved trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching upcz.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
78
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the employee benefits sector, offering services such as benefit cards and motivational tools to employers. Its business model is B2B, focusing on enhancing employee satisfaction and engagement. The website's social media presence across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube supports brand visibility and customer engagement. The use of structured data and SEO best practices suggests a focus on digital marketing and lead generation. While the domain WHOIS data is unavailable, the website content and technical setup indicate a legitimate and established business. No direct contact details were found, which could be improved to enhance customer trust and service accessibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR compliance efforts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or security.txt file limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in formalizing policies and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response information page.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Up Česká republika s.r.o.
Description
Dobré vztahy na pracovišti a angažovaní zaměstnanci jsou klíčem k vysněné společnosti. S Up Benefity to bude hračka.
Key services
Employee benefits programs, Motivational tools, Benefit cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Mluvii Widget, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Ads
Marketing tools
Mluvii Widget, Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and detailed cookie information is provided.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence is confirmed via JSON-LD structured data.
  7. Website uses modern technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  9. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a child theme of Understrap, leveraging jQuery and modern SEO plugins like Rank Math. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site loads asynchronously optimized CSS and JavaScript, indicating performance considerations. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is comprehensive with Open Graph and Twitter Card tags. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site does not show signs of technical debt or outdated libraries but should maintain regular updates and security audits of third-party scripts to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with upcz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review upcz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.