Skip to main content

Security report for up-rs.si

Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo · Government · Slovenia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website up-rs.si is a government-operated access gateway managed by the Slovenian Ministry for Digital Transformation (Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo). The domain is well-established since 1998 and aligns with the official government sector. The site content is minimal and currently displays an access forbidden message, indicating it is a restricted portal likely intended for authorized users only rather than public visitors. This limits the ability to analyze the full website content and services. Technically, the site lacks visible modern web technologies, security headers, or privacy policies, and no HTTPS information is available from the provided data. The minimal content and blocking mechanism suggest a secure access control layer but also limit transparency and user engagement. Overall, the site demonstrates a basic government digital presence but requires improvements in security posture and user-facing information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching up-rs.si

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is owned by a Slovenian government ministry focused on digital transformation, indicating an essential government service provider role. The business model is centered on providing secure access to government digital services or internal resources. The lack of public-facing content and contact information suggests a closed user base, likely government employees or authorized partners. The domain age and registrar consistency support legitimacy and trust. No commercial or marketing activities are evident. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or analytics tracking, consistent with government privacy expectations. The absence of detailed business information or service descriptions limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The security posture is limited by the lack of visible HTTPS enforcement and absence of security headers in the provided data. The access forbidden message indicates some level of access control, but the lack of detailed security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures suggests immature security transparency. No scripts or forms are present to evaluate input sanitization or data protection. The WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, but the site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, and publishing security and privacy policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience for authorized users.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to strengthen security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The page content indicates access is forbidden with message 'Host name received is not for this web site.' This is a blocking or access control page, likely a gateway or security mechanism restricting access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo
Description
The website appears to be an access gateway or portal related to the Ministry for Digital Transformation of Slovenia, likely serving as an entry point or authentication gateway rather than a full public-facing site.
Key services
Access gateway services
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and access is blocked with an 'Access forbidden!' message.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available on the page.
  4. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies detected.
  5. No external links except the name server domain in WHOIS data.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. The site appears to be a restricted access gateway for authorized users only.
  8. WHOIS data confirms government ownership and long domain age.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. No social media or email contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses minimal HTML with inline CSS and no detected JavaScript or modern frameworks. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The site appears to be a static access gateway page with restricted content. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is poor due to absence of meta tags beyond language and title. The technical infrastructure is basic and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with up-rs.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review up-rs.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.