Skip to main content

Security report for unterweger.eu

Nameshift.com · Technology · Netherlands

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website unterweger.eu is a domain sales and transfer service platform operated in partnership with Nameshift.com, a domain escrow and marketplace service. The business model focuses on providing a secure and simple way for buyers to purchase domain names with escrow protection, free assistance, and VAT invoicing. The target audience includes individuals and businesses seeking domain ownership with minimal risk. The website is built using modern web technologies such as SvelteKit and is hosted on a CDN associated with Nameshift.com. However, performance metrics are not available, and the site shows basic content quality with limited interactive elements. From a security perspective, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability impacting user trust and data security. Although some security headers are present, the absence of TLS protocols and HSTS reduces the overall security posture significantly. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating poor privacy compliance. Contact information is limited to a physical address in the Netherlands, with no emails or phone numbers provided, which may affect user confidence. Overall, the website demonstrates a basic level of technical implementation and business credibility but suffers from critical security and privacy compliance gaps. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS deployment, privacy policy publication, and contact transparency are essential to enhance trust and security. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, showing consistency and legitimacy without privacy protection, which is appropriate for this type of service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unterweger.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nameshift.com operates as a niche domain marketplace and escrow service, positioning itself as a secure intermediary for domain transactions. The business model relies on seller commissions while offering buyers free services, including VAT invoicing and assistance. The company targets a European market, as indicated by the physical address and VAT number. The partnership with Nameshift.com is central to the business operations, providing the technological and transactional infrastructure. The lack of extensive marketing or analytics tools suggests a focus on organic or direct sales channels. Growth potential may depend on improving digital trust and expanding contact options. Competitive advantages include escrow protection and a streamlined transfer process with a fast average turnaround time. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and weak SSL configuration may hinder customer acquisition and retention. The company appears small but specialized, with consistent branding and a clear value proposition in the domain sales sector.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is a critical issue for any online service, especially one handling transactions. While some security headers such as HSTS (though not enabled per SSL info), X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options are present, the overall SSL/TLS configuration is inadequate. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and no OCSP stapling or session resumption mechanisms are in place. The site does not publish any security or incident response policies, nor does it provide contact channels for security issues. These deficiencies expose users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the fundamental lack of HTTPS overshadows these positives. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and privacy compliance is recommended to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  5. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  6. Consider adding a security.txt file and incident response contact channels.
  7. Improve website performance metrics and SEO optimization for better user experience.
  8. Add analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor user interactions responsibly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
VAT number
NL864820458B01
Registration number
KvK: 88910652
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the SvelteKit framework, leveraging modern JavaScript and CSS technologies. It uses a CDN hosted by Nameshift.com for asset delivery, which should provide good global availability. However, performance data such as load time and resource count are missing or zero, indicating either incomplete measurement or suboptimal performance. The site is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts indicates minimal user data collection. The technical stack is modern but requires improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and privacy compliance to meet industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unterweger.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unterweger.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.