Skip to main content

Security report for unser-green-deal.de

Unser Green Deal · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unser Green Deal is a German-based advocacy website focused on promoting climate and biodiversity protection aligned with the EU Green Deal and EU Biodiversity Strategy. The site targets environmentally conscious European citizens and stakeholders interested in EU environmental policies. It operates as a small non-profit or governmental advocacy entity, providing information and campaigning for sustainable land and marine protection. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates various plugins for social media feeds, cookie consent management, and spam protection via Google reCAPTCHA. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with mobile optimization, SEO best practices, and a comprehensive privacy framework. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent documentation, and use of anti-spam measures, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though it lacks explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining regular plugin updates to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unser-green-deal.de

This scan found 24 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as an advocacy platform within the environmental and governmental sector, focusing on EU climate and biodiversity initiatives. It leverages digital channels to disseminate information and engage the public on policy matters. The business model is informational and advocacy-driven without direct commercial transactions. The target audience includes policy makers, environmental activists, and the general public interested in EU environmental legislation. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms for content embedding but no direct business partners or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators are limited but the use of modern CMS and compliance tools suggests a commitment to digital professionalism.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. The website uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. Cookie consent is managed with a professional plugin that documents user consent in compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact may limit transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. Overall, the site follows good practices but could improve in formalizing security governance and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential weaknesses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unser Green Deal
Description
KLIMA- UND ARTENSCHUTZ STATT NUTZUNGSVERBOTE - Die EU-Biodiversitätsstrategie als ein wesentlicher Bestandteil des europäischen Green Deal sieht als Ziel unter anderem vor, dass 10 Prozent der Land- und Meeresflächen Europas unter strengen Schutz gestellt werden sollen.
Key services
Information dissemination, Advocacy for climate and biodiversity protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Custom Twitter Feeds, Instagram Feed, WonderPlugin Carousel, Ninja Forms, Google reCAPTCHA, YouTube API
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management with documentation
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Real Cookie Banner Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German language advocacy platform focused on EU Green Deal and biodiversity strategy.
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme and multiple plugins for social media integration and cookie management.
  3. Strong privacy compliance with detailed cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security issues detected.
  5. Contact information is limited to email and contact form; no phone or physical address found.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a well-known CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It uses multiple plugins for social media integration (Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook), cookie consent management (Real Cookie Banner Pro), and form spam protection (Google reCAPTCHA). Hosting appears to be with 1&1 IONOS based on nameservers. Performance is moderate with some preloading and caching mechanisms. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt is low but reliance on multiple third-party plugins requires ongoing maintenance to avoid security risks. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unser-green-deal.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unser-green-deal.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.