Skip to main content

Security report for unplanpourtonavenir.lu

Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-conseils (OAI) · Government · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.unplanpourtonavenir.lu serves as an informational platform for the Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-conseils (OAI) in Luxembourg, focusing on educating and informing students and professionals about the engineering consultancy profession. It provides resources on educational paths, construction projects, and job opportunities, positioning itself as a professional association resource. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.1 and the jQuery Cycle plugin, indicating a somewhat dated technology stack. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile and accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS verification, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed domain name error, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional but requires modernization and improved security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unplanpourtonavenir.lu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention unplanpourtonavenir.lu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for unplanpourtonavenir.lu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small professional government-related entity focused on architecture and engineering consultancy in Luxembourg. Its business model is informational and educational, targeting students and professionals interested in engineering consultancy careers. The site links to the official OAI website, reinforcing its legitimacy and partnership ecosystem. The lack of contact information and privacy policies limits direct engagement and compliance transparency. The site does not appear to monetize through advertising or affiliate programs, focusing instead on professional representation and resource provision. Growth indicators and market positioning are stable but limited by the site's dated technical implementation and minimal digital marketing presence.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, reducing readiness for handling security events. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and compliance to reduce risk and build user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries and other dependencies to current secure versions.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident and data protection officer contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ordre des Architectes et des Ingénieurs-conseils (OAI)
Description
The website provides information about the profession of consulting engineers and architects in Luxembourg, including educational paths, construction projects, and job offers. It serves as an informational resource for students and professionals interested in engineering consultancy.
Key services
Information on engineering consultancy professions, Educational guidance, Job and internship offers, Professional representation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.7.1, jQuery Cycle plugin, SWFObject
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is informational for a professional order in Luxembourg.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  5. Uses outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.7.1).
  6. No visible security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms present on homepage.
  9. Content is in French and targets students and professionals in engineering consultancy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with static HTML enhanced by CSS and JavaScript, relying on older libraries like jQuery 1.7.1 and the jQuery Cycle plugin for carousel functionality. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization beyond basic levels and has limited accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern techniques and updated libraries. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and in need of modernization to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unplanpourtonavenir.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unplanpourtonavenir.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.