Skip to main content

Security report for unitedhealthgroup.com

UnitedHealth Group · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UnitedHealth Group is a leading global healthcare company dedicated to helping people live healthier lives and improving the health system for everyone. The website reflects a mature enterprise with a comprehensive digital presence, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager for content management and Adobe Launch for marketing and analytics. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, demonstrating a commitment to compliance and user privacy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly available. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, supporting UnitedHealth Group's market position as a major healthcare provider.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of unitedhealthgroup.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unitedhealthgroup.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UnitedHealth Group operates in the healthcare sector, providing health services and insurance products. The company targets a broad audience including individuals, employers, and healthcare providers. The website's structured data and social media presence reinforce its brand authority. The business model focuses on healthcare services and insurance, with a large enterprise scale. The digital infrastructure supports marketing and compliance needs effectively. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data was found, but the domain's legitimacy is supported by consistent branding and official channels.

Security posture

The website employs strong security measures including HTTPS, security headers like Content Security Policy, and cookie consent management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. Incident response contacts are not provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is robust but could benefit from additional public-facing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed standards for users with disabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UnitedHealth Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UnitedHealth Group
Description
UnitedHealth Group helps people live healthier lives and helps make the health system work better for everyone.
Key services
healthcare services, health insurance, health system improvement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Launch, Brightcove Video Player, OneTrust Cookie Consent, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics (implied via Adobe Launch)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe Launch for marketing and analytics.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms present.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  5. No WHOIS data available from raw output; domain appears legitimate based on other factors.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses Adobe Launch for tag management and analytics. It incorporates modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. No hosting provider details were explicitly found. The technical stack supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for a large healthcare enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100 +22Low24 findingsView report
  2. 62/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unitedhealthgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unitedhealthgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.