Skip to main content

Security report for unitedhealthgroup.com

UnitedHealth Group · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UnitedHealth Group is a leading enterprise in the healthcare sector, focused on helping people live healthier lives and improving the health system globally. The company offers health insurance and healthcare services, targeting a broad general audience. Their market position is strong as a large enterprise with consistent branding and professional digital presence. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging Adobe Launch for tag management, OneTrust for consent management, and Qualtrics for user feedback, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance, though explicit security policy and incident response contacts are not published. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts transparency but the website's trust signals and corporate presence mitigate concerns. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unitedhealthgroup.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UnitedHealth Group operates in the healthcare industry as an essential business entity. Their business model revolves around providing health insurance and healthcare services, targeting individuals and organizations seeking health system improvements. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem visible through official social media and marketing tools. Their digital presence reflects a focus on compliance and user experience, supporting growth and customer trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor anomaly but does not detract from their established market presence and enterprise scale.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers including CSP, and integration of cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency in incident handling. There is no visible security.txt or dedicated incident response contact, which are recommended best practices for enterprise sites. Overall, the security measures are robust but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance frameworks.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain registration trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UnitedHealth Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UnitedHealth Group
Description
UnitedHealth Group helps people live healthier lives and helps make the health system work better for everyone.
Key services
Health insurance, Healthcare services, Health system improvement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Launch (Tag Manager), Brightcove Video Player, Qualtrics, OneTrust Consent Management
Frameworks
Adobe AEM
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics (implied via Adobe Launch)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch, OneTrust, Qualtrics
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Manager, Qualtrics, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses modern Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe marketing stack.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact pages.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces transparency but site appears legitimate.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Social media presence is official and consistent.
  8. Contact information includes toll-free phone and physical address in Minneapolis, MN.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, supported by Adobe Launch for tag management and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The use of Brightcove for video content and Qualtrics for user feedback indicates a well-integrated technology stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses modern security headers and HTTPS, reflecting good technical hygiene. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and to optimize loading speed further. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for modernization in security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100 +23Low22 findingsView report
  2. 62/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unitedhealthgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unitedhealthgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.