Skip to main content

Security report for union-sociale.coop

UNION SOCIALE · Other · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website for UNION SOCIALE, a French cooperative established in 2002, is currently inaccessible, displaying only a generic error message. This lack of accessible content prevents detailed analysis of their business offerings, digital presence, and user engagement. The domain registration data is consistent and indicates a legitimate entity with a long operational history. However, the absence of website content and security features such as HTTPS and security headers significantly diminishes the site's trustworthiness and usability. The technical infrastructure appears to be either misconfigured or undergoing maintenance, resulting in a poor digital maturity assessment. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security policies, and no privacy or cookie policies are present to indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the site presents a high risk for users due to its inaccessibility and lack of transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching union-sociale.coop

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UNION SOCIALE appears to be a cooperative entity based in France with a domain registered since 2002, suggesting an established presence. However, the lack of accessible website content limits insights into their market positioning, business model, and service offerings. No contact details, certifications, or trust indicators are available online, which restricts assessment of their competitive advantages or partnership ecosystem. The cooperative nature implied by the '.coop' TLD aligns with the registrant organization name. Without further data, it is difficult to evaluate revenue streams or growth indicators.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is poor. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security frameworks are referenced. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The website's inaccessibility due to an error page further suggests potential technical or security misconfigurations. There is no evidence of secure data handling or user protection mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Resolve website errors to restore full content accessibility and improve user experience.
  4. Deploy standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  5. Publish clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and facilitate security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns minimal HTML content with an error message 'The website encountered an unexpected error. Try again later.' indicating blocked or inaccessible content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
UNION SOCIALE
Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to an error page.
  2. No metadata, forms, or external links detected in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or social media links available.
  5. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate, long-standing French cooperative organization.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. Website likely suffers from technical issues or is under maintenance.
  8. No evidence of advertising or analytics technologies.
  9. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
  10. WAF or security blocking is likely causing content inaccessibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML error message, indicating a failure in content delivery or backend processing. No metadata, scripts, or external resources are detected, suggesting a lack of active frontend technologies or CMS. The WHOIS data shows the domain is registered with Domains.coop Limited and uses name servers ns1.insite.coop and ns2.insite.coop, but no hosting provider or platform details are available. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers points to potential technical debt and security risks. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with union-sociale.coop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review union-sociale.coop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.