Skip to main content

Security report for unicorn.com

Unicorn a.s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Unicorn a.s. is a well-established European IT company founded in 1990, specializing in delivering large-scale information systems and IT solutions. The company targets business customers primarily in the Czech Republic and broader European market, offering a range of IT products, services, and solutions that provide competitive advantages and high added value. The website reflects a professional business presence with consistent branding and clear contact information, supporting its market position as a reputable technology provider. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and UU5 frameworks, with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted with a reputable registrar and DNS providers, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is adequately addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit privacy or cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and governance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security header implementation, and published security policies to strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unicorn.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Unicorn a.s. operates as a key player in the European IT sector, focusing on enterprise-level information systems and IT solutions. Its business model centers on providing comprehensive IT services and products that deliver competitive advantages to clients. The company’s longevity since 1990 and large employee base (~2500) indicate significant market presence and operational scale. The website’s integration with social media platforms and use of advanced web technologies reflect a mature digital strategy. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies suggests potential gaps in compliance and risk management. The company’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the site, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. The business intelligence points to a stable, reputable IT solutions provider with opportunities to enhance transparency and security governance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. Absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager and analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, privacy policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Add a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Unicorn a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Unicorn a.s.
Description
Unicorn je renomovaná evropská společnost poskytující ty největší informační systémy a řešení z oblasti informačních technologií.
Key services
information systems, IT solutions, IT products, IT services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, UU5, Plus4U, JavaScript
Frameworks
UU5, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW- IDs)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. No visible security headers in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information found.
  7. Website content is professional and business-focused.
  8. Social media presence is linked and consistent with company branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using React and UU5 frameworks, supported by a custom CMS solution (UU5 Webkit) developed by Unicorn Universe. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Hosting and DNS are managed by reputable providers, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including structured data and meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility features and implement security best practices to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unicorn.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unicorn.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.