Skip to main content

Security report for unicode.lt

UAB "Interneto vizija" · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website unicode.lt/auth serves as a user login and registration portal primarily targeting Lithuanian-speaking users. It is associated with the company UAB "Interneto vizija", a Lithuanian registrar, which aligns with the domain registration data. The site provides basic user authentication services without extensive business content or marketing information, indicating a focused utility platform rather than a broad commercial presence. The technical infrastructure relies on common web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, suggesting a moderate level of digital maturity but lacking advanced modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Security posture is moderate; while forms use secure POST methods and password confirmation, the absence of security headers, anti-CSRF tokens, and cookie consent mechanisms highlight areas for improvement. No direct contact or incident response information is provided, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the site is functional but basic in design and security, suitable for a small business or service with limited public-facing content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching unicode.lt

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
15
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind unicode.lt/auth appears to be a small Lithuanian entity focused on providing user authentication services, possibly for a related platform branded as 'Skulas'. The domain age and WHOIS data are consistent with a relatively new business established in 2020. The lack of extensive marketing content, contact details, or certifications suggests a limited market presence and a niche target audience of registered users. The business model centers on user account management without visible monetization or partnership disclosures. The absence of social media or external business links limits visibility into the broader ecosystem or growth indicators. Strategic opportunities include enhancing transparency, expanding service offerings, and improving user engagement through clearer business information and support channels.

Security posture

Security analysis reveals a moderate maturity level with secure form submission practices but notable gaps in security best practices. The site lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of anti-CSRF tokens in forms increases risk of cross-site request forgery. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is minimal, with only a linked PDF privacy policy and no cookie consent mechanism. These factors collectively suggest a need for enhanced security controls and compliance measures to protect user data and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify its enforcement site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens in all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Develop and display a cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information and publish a security incident response policy to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB "Interneto vizija"
Description
User login and registration portal for a service likely related to 'Skulas' brand or platform.
Key services
User authentication, User registration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, ACE Admin Template
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Secure form submission via POST
  • Password confirmation on registration

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a user login and registration portal with Lithuanian language content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages directly linked except a PDF privacy policy on a related domain.
  3. No visible contact information or security policies on the page.
  4. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  5. Uses Cloudflare nameservers but no evidence of Cloudflare WAF blocking.
  6. Forms use POST method but lack visible CSRF tokens or advanced security measures.
  7. No social media or phone contact details found.
  8. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's country and business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, integrated within the ACE Admin Template framework. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS services, though no explicit CDN or WAF protections are evident in the content. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. The HTML structure is valid and includes fallback scripts for legacy browsers. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks, indicating potential technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies or tracking scripts detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with unicode.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review unicode.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.