Skip to main content

Security report for umamekk.ee

Uma Mekk · Other · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Uma Mekk is a regional food brand based in Estonia, specifically targeting the Vana-Võromaa area. The website serves as a platform for local food and beverage producers to obtain branding and certification under the Uma Mekk trademark. The business model focuses on promoting local food products and supporting regional producers. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi Builder and Bootstrap framework, indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO and structured data, improving search visibility. The site is mobile optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though explicit privacy and security policies are absent. Tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel is present, indicating moderate user data collection. Overall, Uma Mekk presents a credible and professional online presence for a small regional food brand.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching umamekk.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local food brand authority in the Vana-Võromaa region, targeting food producers and consumers interested in regional specialties. The business leverages branding and certification to create market differentiation for local products. The website's content and structure support this focus, with clear branding and regional emphasis. The absence of detailed contact information and formal policies suggests a small-scale operation with potential for growth in digital maturity. The Facebook presence supports community engagement. The business likely generates revenue through certification fees or partnerships with local producers. The technical platform choice (WordPress with Divi) supports scalability and ease of content management. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in formal security governance and transparency. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. Tracking technologies are used responsibly but could benefit from clearer user privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but should be enhanced with formal policies and incident response readiness to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file and disclose incident response contacts to improve vulnerability management transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance and usability standards.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security risks.
  5. Consider adding explicit business contact information on the website to improve credibility and user support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Uma Mekk
Description
Uma Mekk on Vana-Võromaa toidutoodangu kaubamärgis, mida saavad taotleda siinsed toiduvaldkonnas tegutsevad ettevõtjad. Umal söögil om mekki.
Key services
Local food and beverage branding, Certification for food producers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO, Divi Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes (cookie consent)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional/local food brand platform for Vana-Võromaa area in Estonia.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi Builder and Bootstrap framework.
  3. Includes cookie consent mechanism via CookieYes.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  5. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in provided HTML.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook link.
  7. Good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  9. Tracking includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, indicating moderate user tracking.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with a popular page builder (Divi) and Bootstrap for responsive design, indicating a modern and flexible technical stack. SEO is well supported by Yoast SEO and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate, with external resources loaded from reputable CDNs. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, reflecting attention to privacy regulations. The hosting and domain registration are consistent and reputable, with Radicenter OÜ as registrar and Wavecom nameservers. No critical technical issues or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with umamekk.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review umamekk.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.