Skip to main content

Security report for uma-pen.com

uma Schreibgeräte Ullmann GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

uma Schreibgeräte Ullmann GmbH is a German manufacturing company specializing in high-quality, customizable promotional writing instruments including pens made from diverse materials such as metal, plastic, recycled PET, and wood. The company emphasizes sustainability and innovation, positioning itself as one of the world's leading manufacturers in the promotional ballpoint pen market. Their website offers product configurators, customization options, and detailed product information targeting business customers seeking promotional products. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries like RequireJS, jQuery, and Swiper.js, integrates Google Tag Manager and HubSpot Analytics for marketing and tracking, and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable or inconsistent, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Contact information and certifications such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 are clearly presented, enhancing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uma-pen.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uma-pen.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
0
Customers
24
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uma-pen.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on promotional writing instruments with a strong sustainability angle. Their business model is B2B, serving clients who require customized promotional pens. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and a strong market position supported by certifications and awards. The presence of multiple language options and social media channels suggests an international reach. The company leverages digital tools for product configuration and customer engagement, indicating a mature digital presence. However, the lack of WHOIS transparency and missing legal pages could be improved to strengthen trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible forms or input fields reduce the attack surface, but the lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency. The WHOIS data inconsistency is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify legal usage and responsibilities.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve security culture and customer confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
uma Schreibgeräte Ullmann GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
uma Schreibgeräte Ullmann GmbH
Description
uma Schreibgeräte Ullmann GmbH produces high-quality, individual promotional writing instruments including pens made from metal, plastic, recycled materials, and wood. They emphasize sustainability and innovation in their product lines such as recycled PET pens.
Key services
Manufacture of promotional pens, Product configurator, Customization and finishing services, Sustainability-focused product lines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
RequireJS, jQuery 3.7.0, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  4. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not found in WHOIS registry
  5. Professional manufacturing business website with good content and navigation
  6. Contact information clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  10. No forms detected on main page for direct user data collection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with RequireJS for module loading, jQuery 3.7.0 for DOM manipulation, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. Google Tag Manager and HubSpot Analytics are integrated for marketing and user behavior tracking. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, indicating GDPR awareness. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of security headers and missing legal pages represent technical debt and compliance gaps that should be addressed to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uma-pen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uma-pen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.