Skip to main content

Security report for ulubele.org

Mobinet SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ulubele.org is currently inaccessible for normal browsing as it serves a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or suspicious traffic. The domain is registered to Mobinet SIA, a Latvian company established in 2006, indicating a legitimate and long-standing registration. However, the website content is minimal and does not provide business or product information, preventing a full assessment of the business model or market position. The technical infrastructure shows use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) and standard security measures such as reCAPTCHA v2 and Google Analytics tracking. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected, indicating room for security improvements. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no contact information is available on the page. Overall, the site is currently in a blocked state, limiting content and security analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ulubele.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the security challenge page, no direct business content or contact information is accessible. The domain is owned by Mobinet SIA, a Latvian organization, but no further business details, services, or market positioning can be derived from the current content. The presence of multiple CMS meta tags suggests legacy or multi-platform usage, but no active business model or customer engagement is visible. The site appears to be protected against automated abuse, possibly indicating a security-focused or sensitive service environment.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja security services to block suspicious traffic via CAPTCHA challenges, which is a strong bot mitigation measure. However, the lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and use of outdated CMS versions present security risks. The SSL/TLS configuration could not be fully assessed but is presumed present due to Cloudflare hosting. No privacy or cookie policies are implemented, which is a compliance gap. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager, indicating user tracking but without visible consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating software, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers and compliance policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Upgrade Joomla and WordPress installations to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and implement user consent mechanisms.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details to improve credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website is serving a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Mobinet SIA
Description
The website is currently serving a security CAPTCHA challenge page to validate visitors and prevent automated/bot access. It is not presenting business or product information.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v2, BitNinja security
Frameworks
Joomla, WordPress
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No business content or policies are accessible.
  3. Outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags.
  4. No contact information or privacy/cookie policies found.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. Domain is registered to a Latvian company with a long history.
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare and protected by BitNinja security services, which provide bot mitigation via CAPTCHA challenges. The technology stack includes legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and pose security risks. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks modern SEO and accessibility optimizations. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. The site performance and loading speed could not be fully assessed due to the blocking page. Overall, the technical infrastructure requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ulubele.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ulubele.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.