Skip to main content

Security report for ultimatebeaver.com

Brainstorm Force · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ultimate Addons for Beaver Builder is a mature, well-established WordPress plugin provider specializing in enhancing the Beaver Builder page builder with custom modules, templates, and features. The company operates under Brainstorm Force, a recognized entity in the WordPress ecosystem, offering a range of products and services that cater to web designers, agencies, and WordPress users seeking to accelerate website development. The website demonstrates a professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content focused on product offerings and customer testimonials. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies including React and jQuery, hosted via Cloudflare, and employs Astra Theme and Beaver Builder frameworks. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, though improvements in HSTS configuration and SSL cipher suite details are recommended. Privacy compliance is partial, with a clear privacy policy but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and credible, with strong business and technical foundations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ultimatebeaver.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a key player in the WordPress addon market, leveraging its parent company Brainstorm Force's reputation and ecosystem. Its business model revolves around SaaS-style plugin sales with ongoing support and updates, targeting WordPress professionals and agencies. The company maintains a robust partnership and affiliate network, evident from linked domains and affiliate program references. Growth is supported by regular product updates, a comprehensive template library, and active community engagement through social media and support channels. The presence of white labeling and multisite compatibility indicates a focus on agency and enterprise customers. The company’s strategic use of marketing tools like ConvertBox and SureTriggers enhances lead generation and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and X-Content-Type-Options configured. The SSL certificate is valid but lacks detailed cipher suite information, suggesting room for enhancement. The absence of a fully enabled HSTS policy (missing includeSubDomains and preload) is a minor gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the site does not publicly disclose a security policy or incident response plan, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Forms are secured with Google Invisible reCAPTCHA, reducing spam and abuse risks. Overall, the security measures align with industry best practices but could benefit from additional policy disclosures and stronger SSL configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance SSL configuration by specifying strong cipher suites and algorithms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack using Astra Theme and Beaver Builder, supplemented by React and jQuery libraries. It integrates multiple plugins such as FluentForm for forms, ConvertPro for marketing popups, and SureTriggers for automation. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site demonstrates good performance with fast load times and mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are present, including skip links and ARIA labels. The technical implementation is robust, though some CSS and JavaScript optimizations could further improve performance. The presence of multiple marketing popups indicates active lead generation but should be balanced to avoid user experience degradation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ultimatebeaver.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ultimatebeaver.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.