Skip to main content

Security report for ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de

yorkwachter · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ulmer Münsterturmlauf is a specialized event website promoting the annual tower running race held in Ulm, Germany. The site provides detailed event information, registration links, news updates, and partner information, targeting runners and sports enthusiasts. The business operates as a small, niche event organizer with a focus on local and regional participants, emphasizing sustainability and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO best practices. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure connections. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, relying on contact forms and newsletter signups. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Ulmer Münsterturmlauf website positions itself as a key information hub for the annual tower running event, leveraging partnerships with local sports clubs, media, and sponsors. Its business model centers on event promotion and participant engagement, with revenue likely from registration fees and sponsorships. The site integrates with related running events and regional partners, enhancing its market presence. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a positive user experience. Growth indicators include active news updates and sustainability initiatives. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving local government, sports organizations, and media outlets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS usage. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which could enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good but not comprehensive.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
yorkwachter
Description
Ulmer Münsterturm-Lauf – „Wir treibens auf die Spitze“ – Rekordjagd zum höchsten Kirchturm der Welt.
Key services
Organizing the Ulmer Münsterturmlauf event, Providing event information and registration, Publishing news and results, Promoting sustainability initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.27.3, jQuery, Rank Math SEO, YouTube iframe API, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
tracking202 (einsteinmarathon.de/tracking202)
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, tracking202
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed event site for Ulmer Münsterturmlauf.
  2. Content is in German and well structured with SEO optimization.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage.
  4. Contact is primarily via forms and newsletter signup; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and SEO plugins.
  6. External links mostly to partner and related event sites.
  7. Tracking scripts present but no aggressive advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled and good.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It loads external resources from trusted domains and uses YouTube iframe API for video content. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and CDN usage. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are well implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site relies on external tracking scripts, which should be monitored for privacy compliance. Hosting appears stable with Cloudflare DNS, but no explicit hosting provider details are available.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ulmer-muensterturmlauf.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.