Skip to main content

Security report for ukg.in

UKG · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UKG is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in human capital management, workforce management, and compliance software solutions. The company serves over 80,000 organizations globally, offering a comprehensive suite of HR, payroll, scheduling, and analytics products designed to improve workplace experiences and operational efficiency. Their market position is strong, supported by a consistent brand presence and extensive resource offerings. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern JavaScript modules and integrated with Google Tag Manager and Didomi Consent Manager for analytics and privacy compliance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and integrates a robust cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. Overall, UKG's website reflects a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious enterprise platform with strong business credibility. Strategic enhancements in transparency around security policies and incident response would further strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ukg.in

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

UKG operates in the enterprise HR technology sector with a B2B SaaS business model. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product portfolio addressing workforce management, compliance, and analytics needs across multiple industries. The company targets medium to large enterprises globally, emphasizing customer success and long-term partnerships. Their ecosystem includes localized domains for various regions, indicating a global footprint. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement through demos, resources, and customer stories. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based software licenses and professional services. The company invests in thought leadership and community engagement, as evidenced by extensive resource libraries and customer experience initiatives. UKG's strategic focus on innovation and customer-centric solutions positions it well for sustained growth in the HR technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of a consent management platform to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. The use of modern frameworks and controlled third-party scripts reduces the attack surface. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. Incident response readiness is not clearly communicated, which could impact stakeholder confidence in security incident handling. Recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel, and continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies to mitigate emerging risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but can benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security controls and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure program.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing data protection officer contact details and compliance certifications.
  5. Continue investing in privacy compliance mechanisms and user consent management.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UKG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UKG
Description
Our purpose is people™ and we provide HR service delivery software, HCM and workforce management solutions that inspire your people and elevate the work experience.
Key services
Workforce Management, Time & Attendance, Compliance, Scheduling, Reporting and Analytics, HR Service Delivery
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent Manager, JavaScript ES6 modules
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS (Drupal 10) with good technical implementation
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place
  3. Strong branding and consistent messaging across global localized domains
  4. No exposed security vulnerabilities or suspicious content detected
  5. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business information
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via forms and pages
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, indicating a solid technical foundation. The use of ES6 JavaScript modules and integration with Google Tag Manager and Didomi Consent Manager reflects contemporary web development practices. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, supporting a broad user base. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in asset delivery and caching strategies. The structured data implementation via JSON-LD enhances SEO and content discoverability. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve hosting transparency and implement advanced performance monitoring to maintain optimal user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ukg.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ukg.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.