Skip to main content

Security report for uk.com

Iwin68 · Other · Vietnam

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iwin68 is an online gambling platform targeting Vietnamese users, offering a variety of betting and gaming services including sports betting, card games, lottery, and promotional offers. The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and includes SEO optimization via Rank Math. It has a moderate level of technical maturity with responsive design and social media integration. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the platform appears functional and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uk.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
40
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uk.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
89,144
Employees
223
Customers
77,943
Third parties
10,978
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-07-13 · 2,915 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for uk.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –britanica.uk.com2026-07-13
  • –britanica.uk.com2026-07-13
  • –mail.1lofadrivingschool.uk.com2026-07-13
  • –globaltefl.uk.com2026-07-13
  • –ork.uk.com2026-07-07

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate uk.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-28

Masked preview

  • uk•••.com.comLowvarious
  • uk•••.comuk.comLowvarious

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of uk.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iwin68 operates in the online gambling sector in Vietnam, a market with regulatory and reputational challenges. The business model relies on online betting services and affiliate marketing. The platform targets mature audiences interested in gambling and betting. The presence of multiple social media channels and promotional banners indicates active marketing efforts. However, the lack of verifiable domain registration and limited privacy compliance may affect user trust and regulatory standing. The company provides clear contact information and basic legal pages, supporting moderate business credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but does not implement key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS, which are important for preventing common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is found. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and limited privacy compliance indicators suggest gaps in regulatory adherence, particularly GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Verify and register domain WHOIS information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iwin68
Description
Iwin68 là cổng game đổi thưởng uy tín, đại diện thương hiệu Iwin tại Việt Nam. Truy cập ngay Iwin68 club để nhận ngay các chương trình khuyến mãi hấp dẫn.
Key services
Cá cược thể thao, Game Bài trực tuyến, Bắn cá & Nổ hũ, Lô đề & Xổ số, Khuyến mãi & Ưu đãi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Flatsome theme, Rank Math SEO plugin, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Vietnamese online gambling platform branded as Iwin68.
  2. Content is in Vietnamese language with gambling-related services.
  3. No WHOIS registration data available for the domain nutritional.ru.com.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with Flatsome theme and Rank Math SEO plugin.
  5. HTTPS is enabled but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. Contact information including email and phone number is provided.
  7. Social media presence is extensive with multiple platforms linked.
  8. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  9. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible.
  10. Website content is mature audience oriented due to gambling services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with a popular commercial theme (Flatsome) and SEO plugin (Rank Math). It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for UI interactions and sliders. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some prefetching optimizations. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be improved with enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uk.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uk.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.