Skip to main content

Security report for ufloat.de

FLUIDO LTD · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ufloat, operated by FLUIDO LTD, is a small German-based e-commerce business specializing in providing durable floating bodies for DIY water projects such as rafts, docks, and pontoon boats. The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce and Elementor, supported by various marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, targeting DIY enthusiasts and hobbyists interested in water-based construction projects. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS/CDN usage, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ufloat.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ufloat.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ufloat.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ufloat occupies a niche market supplying pontoon and floating components for self-built watercraft and platforms. Its business model revolves around direct online sales via WooCommerce. The company leverages social media channels on Facebook and Instagram to engage its target audience. The use of trusted third-party services like eTrusted and Usercentrics indicates a focus on customer trust and regulatory compliance. The absence of detailed company registration data and contact information on the site suggests a small-scale operation. Growth potential lies in expanding product offerings and enhancing customer support visibility. The partnership ecosystem includes major analytics and marketing platforms but no direct business partners were identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS, providing a solid baseline for secure communications. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site uses cookie consent tools compliant with GDPR requirements but lacks a published privacy policy and incident response contacts, which are critical for compliance and trust. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small e-commerce site but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contact information.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program and host a security.txt file at the root domain.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility including verified company emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FLUIDO LTD
Description
Mit Ufloat können kreative DIY-Wasserprojekte wie Flöße, Stege oder Badeplattformen einfach mit belastbaren Schwimmkörpern umgesetzt werden.
Key services
Supply of durable floating bodies for DIY water projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, WooCommerce 10.0.4, Elementor 3.30.3, Yoast SEO 25.5, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Cookie Consent, Microsoft Clarity, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-761562316)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
WooCommerce Conversion Tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site focused on DIY floating projects.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and plugins for SEO, analytics, and marketing.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or in metadata.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  7. Security headers could be improved.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with WooCommerce 10.0.4 and Elementor 3.30.3, indicating a modern and widely supported CMS and e-commerce platform. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and cookie consent, including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Usercentrics. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy documentation need improvement to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ufloat.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ufloat.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.