Skip to main content

Security report for udo.solutions

Schober Information Group Deutschland GmbH · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website udo.solutions currently hosts only a default nginx test page on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, indicating that the web server is operational but no actual business content has been deployed. The registrant organization is Schober Information Group Deutschland GmbH, a German company registered in 2021. However, the website does not reflect this business presence or provide any relevant information about services, contact details, or policies. Technically, the site uses nginx on a Linux platform with FingerprintJS for client fingerprinting, but lacks security headers, privacy policies, and cookie consent mechanisms. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data, which is a critical security gap. Overall, the site is incomplete and not ready for public or business use.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching udo.solutions

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain is registered to a legitimate German company, but the website content is a placeholder default server page, indicating either a new or inactive deployment. There are no visible business models, services, or customer engagement mechanisms on the site. The lack of contact information and policies suggests the site is not yet operational for business purposes. The domain age is appropriate for a recently founded company, but the absence of content limits any meaningful business intelligence insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on the site.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS enforcement information, lack of security headers, and exposure of a default server page which can reveal server details to attackers. The use of FingerprintJS indicates some level of client tracking, but without privacy disclosures this raises compliance concerns. DNSSEC is not enabled, which reduces DNS security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet basic security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Replace the default nginx test page with actual business content and contact information.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  6. Provide contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  7. Remove or disclose client fingerprinting practices to comply with privacy regulations.
  8. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Schober Information Group Deutschland GmbH
Description
No business description available; the website displays a default nginx test page indicating the web server is operational.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
nginx, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, FingerprintJS
Platforms
Linux
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
FingerprintJS
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website serves default nginx test page indicating no active content deployment.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details on the website.
  4. WHOIS data is complete and consistent but website does not reflect business activity.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available.
  6. FingerprintJS used for client fingerprinting, but no privacy disclosures.
  7. External links only to redhat.com and nginx.net, related to server software.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on nginx HTTP server on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, hosted by InterNetX GmbH. The presence of FingerprintJS indicates use of modern client fingerprinting technology, but no CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, and SEO is minimal due to the placeholder content. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content. The absence of security headers and HTTPS details are technical risks. The domain registration is consistent and transparent, but the website infrastructure is incomplete and requires modernization and content deployment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with udo.solutions. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review udo.solutions.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.