Skip to main content

Security report for uabtratc.lt

UAB Tauragės regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Tauragės regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras is a regional waste management company based in Tauragė, Lithuania. The company provides comprehensive waste collection, management, and recycling services to residents and businesses in the region. Their website offers detailed information on waste collection schedules, fees, reception locations, and additional services such as a useful items exchange space. The company positions itself as a responsible environmental service provider with a focus on proper waste handling and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing popular plugins such as LayerSlider and Slider Revolution for rich content presentation. It employs Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure connection, and shows good mobile optimization and navigation clarity. However, some accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a good baseline with HTTPS and secure form handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and domain usage suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its intended audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency measures to strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching uabtratc.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention uabtratc.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for uabtratc.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the waste management sector, serving a regional market in Lithuania. Its business model centers on providing municipal and commercial waste collection and processing services, supported by public procurement and auctions. The website indicates a medium-sized entity with a clear focus on environmental responsibility and community service. The presence of a partner domain (ekoatris.lt) suggests collaboration in digital self-service or waste management solutions. The company targets local residents and businesses, emphasizing responsible waste sorting and disposal. The business appears stable with consistent branding and a comprehensive service offering, though no financial or founding year data was found.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate to good. The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. Security headers are not explicitly detected, which is a recommended improvement. The use of secure forms and absence of vulnerable libraries are positive indicators. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated through privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is secure for general use but should enhance compliance and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden security.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear incident response contacts and data protection officer information to enhance trust and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Tauragės regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Tauragės regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras
Description
Company providing waste management services in Tauragė region, Lithuania. Services include waste collection schedules, fees, waste reception locations, and useful waste-related information.
Key services
Waste collection scheduling, Waste management fee information, Waste reception locations and pricing, Useful items exchange space, Public procurement and auctions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with popular plugins for sliders and content presentation. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site could improve by adding security headers and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with uabtratc.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review uabtratc.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.