Skip to main content

Security report for tyniste.cz

Město Týniště nad Orlicí · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Týniště nad Orlicí operates an official municipal website serving residents and visitors with local government information, news, events, and public services. The site positions itself as a trusted source for municipal updates and community engagement, supported by clear contact details and social media presence. The business model is typical for a local government entity, focusing on public service delivery rather than commercial activities. Technically, the website uses a proprietary CMS called Public4u, supplemented by common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a moderate performance experience. SEO and accessibility features are basic but functional. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring secure communication. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good baseline practices such as HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of security headers and lack of explicit security or privacy policies indicate room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap, reducing confidence in domain legitimacy, though the website content and official contact information mitigate this concern. Overall, the website is a reliable and professional municipal portal with moderate technical sophistication and a generally good security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy transparency, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tyniste.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as the digital face of the local government of Týniště nad Orlicí, targeting residents and local stakeholders. It provides essential municipal services, event information, and public notices, positioning itself as a key community resource. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on governance and public administration. The site leverages partnerships with local entities such as police and fire departments, and integrates social media channels for broader engagement. Growth indicators include active event calendars and digital service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government portals and service providers. The website's operations reflect a stable, small-sized municipal entity with a focus on transparency and citizen services.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms indicate GDPR awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but regular updates and security audits are recommended. Compliance with GDPR is partially demonstrated through cookie consent but could be enhanced with comprehensive privacy and security policies. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible on the site.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and security policies to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with relevant standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Město Týniště nad Orlicí
VAT number
CZ00275468
Registration number
275468
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Týniště nad Orlicí
Description
Official municipal website providing information and services related to the town of Týniště nad Orlicí, including news, events, municipal office details, and public services.
Key services
Municipal news and updates, Event calendar, Public forms and requests, Contact information for municipal offices, Links to municipal services such as police, fire department, culture, sport
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Public4u CMS, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local residents.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a government domain.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and has cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie usage found.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies detected.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter is active.
  8. Site uses a proprietary CMS (Public4u) with common JS libraries.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, jQuery UI, and Swiper.js for UI components and interactivity. The site employs responsive design techniques and includes mobile menu scripts for usability on smaller devices. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded, but no heavy frameworks detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tyniste.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tyniste.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.