Skip to main content

Security report for twoday.se

twoday · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

twoday is a large Nordic IT consultancy specializing in IT consulting, data and AI, software engineering, digital experiences, business applications, and cloud platforms with security focus. The company serves over 8,000 clients in both public and private sectors, supported by a team of 2,700 technology experts. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, targeting large and medium-sized organizations primarily in Sweden and the Nordic region. Technically, the site uses HubSpot CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, and modern JavaScript libraries, hosted behind Cloudflare. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is currently invalid or missing, which significantly impacts the security posture. Security headers are present but cannot compensate for the lack of valid HTTPS. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy, cookie policy, and consent mechanisms implemented via Cookiebot. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and a contact form. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent SSL/TLS fixes to improve security and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twoday.se

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

twoday holds a strong market position as a leading Nordic IT consultancy with a broad service portfolio covering data & AI, software engineering, digital experience, business applications, and cloud security. Their business model focuses on consulting services and proprietary products, targeting both public and private sectors. The company leverages a large expert workforce and has a significant client base, indicating stable revenue streams and growth potential. The website supports multiple country versions, indicating regional expansion. The use of HubSpot CMS and integration with marketing and analytics tools shows digital maturity. The absence of explicit terms of service or security policies online suggests areas for improvement in transparency. Social media presence and customer case studies enhance credibility and marketing reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with several best practices such as security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) and cookie consent management. However, the critical issue is the invalid or missing SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which severely undermine the security posture and user trust. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of proper SSL/TLS configuration is a major risk. There is no visible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site uses Cloudflare as a CDN but does not appear to leverage its full security capabilities. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols.
  2. Enable strong cipher suites and OCSP stapling to improve SSL performance and security.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms to maintain best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS using Bootstrap and jQuery, with additional libraries like Splide.js for carousels and Masonry.js for layout. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no explicit load time data. Accessibility is basic with some screen reader text and skip links. The main technical risk is the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which must be addressed to avoid user trust issues and potential data interception. The site uses modern front-end technologies and is well structured, indicating good technical implementation aside from security gaps.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twoday.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twoday.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.