Skip to main content

Security report for twoday.dk

twoday · Technology · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

50/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

twoday is a large Danish technology company specializing in digital transformation, AI, software engineering, business applications, and cloud platform services. With over 3,000 specialists and more than 8,000 customers across the Nordic region, twoday positions itself as a leading Microsoft Solution Partner delivering comprehensive IT consulting and digital solutions for private and public sectors. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-branded, targeting organizations seeking advanced technology services. Technically, the site leverages HubSpot CMS and modern JavaScript libraries but lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are present but cannot compensate for the missing SSL/TLS configuration. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates good digital maturity but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching twoday.dk

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
50

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

twoday operates in the technology sector focusing on digital transformation services including AI, software development, cloud security, and business applications. The company serves a broad customer base from startups to large enterprises (C25 companies) and maintains a strong Nordic presence with over 30 offices. Their business model centers on consulting, custom software solutions, and cloud platform services, leveraging partnerships such as Microsoft Solution Partner status. The company emphasizes expertise and scale, with 3,000 specialists and a wide portfolio of services. The website content and navigation reflect a mature marketing approach with clear service categories and case studies, supporting lead generation and brand positioning.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential interception risks. While security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options are configured, their effectiveness is limited without proper TLS encryption. No known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, but the lack of TLS protocols and cipher suites is a critical gap. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found on the site, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, showing compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Enhance security header configurations with includeSubDomains and preload for HSTS.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
twoday a/s
Registration number
29973334
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and uses a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Splide.js, Swiper.js, and Masonry for layout and interactive components. Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity are used for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, though accessibility is basic. Performance metrics are not provided but inferred as slow due to zero load time and resource count data. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter cards. The lack of SSL/TLS is a major technical deficiency impacting security and user trust. Hosting is via Cloudflare, but SSL is not properly configured. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with twoday.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review twoday.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.