Skip to main content

Security report for tvginsights.com

Site Offline · Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website tvginsights.com is currently offline and displays only a minimal placeholder page indicating it has been disabled for technical reasons. There is no accessible content, metadata, or business information available on the site. The domain is registered and uses Sherweb for DNS and mail services, but no SSL certificate is installed, and HTTPS is not supported. This results in a poor security posture and low trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or forms are available. Overall, the site lacks any meaningful digital presence or business information, severely limiting its utility and credibility. From a technical perspective, the site runs on an Apache server but lacks modern security configurations such as TLS protocols, HSTS, and OCSP stapling. Performance metrics are unavailable due to the offline status. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, and no external business or social media links are present except for a single external image resource. Security evaluation reveals critical issues including the absence of HTTPS and SSL certificates, no security headers, and no vulnerability mitigations. The domain registration appears consistent but the lack of active content and security measures significantly reduces the domain's legitimacy score. The overall risk is high due to the offline status and missing security controls. Strategic recommendations include immediate restoration of website content, implementation of a valid SSL certificate, enabling HTTPS, and adoption of security best practices. Additionally, publishing privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and business details would improve trust and compliance. Until these improvements are made, the site remains non-functional and insecure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tvginsights.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content and metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is registered and uses Sherweb hosting and mail services, but no company name, description, services, or market positioning information is available. There are no indications of target audience, business model, or partnerships. The lack of digital presence suggests the business may be inactive or undergoing technical issues. No revenue streams, growth indicators, or strategic partnerships can be identified from the current data.

Security posture

The security posture of tvginsights.com is poor. The site lacks HTTPS support and does not have a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers such as HSTS or Content-Security-Policy are configured. TLS protocols are disabled, and no modern cipher suites are supported. Vulnerabilities related to missing encryption and lack of session resumption mechanisms are present. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Configure security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  5. Restore website content and provide clear business and contact information to enhance credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4 server with Sherweb DNS and mail services. The site currently serves only a minimal static HTML page indicating it is offline. No CMS or frameworks are detected. No JavaScript libraries or analytics scripts are present. The site lacks HTTPS support and modern TLS protocols, resulting in a basic and insecure technical setup. Performance data is unavailable due to the offline status. The external resource loaded is a tiled background image from websitesettings.com. The technical debt is high, and modernization is required to restore functionality and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tvginsights.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tvginsights.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.