Skip to main content

Security report for turistika.cz

Turistika.cz s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Turistika.cz s.r.o. operates a Czech-language tourism and travel experience sharing platform focused on hiking, trips, and travelogues. The website targets experienced tourists and travelers who share tips and experiences, monetizing through advertising revenue sharing. The platform holds a solid position in the Czech tourism community with a medium-sized business profile. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5, Google Fonts, Cookiebot for consent management, Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content, and no direct company contact information was identified, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, safe, and compliant with cookie consent regulations but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching turistika.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Turistika.cz operates a content-sharing business model focused on tourism and travel in the Czech Republic. It leverages user-generated content and advertising partnerships to generate revenue. The target audience is experienced tourists and travelers seeking trip tips and destination information. The company appears to be a medium-sized entity with consistent branding and good content quality. The platform integrates multiple third-party services for analytics and advertising, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of WHOIS data and direct contact information may impact trust and credibility. The business could strengthen its market position by publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies and improving transparency around company information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a detailed cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR standards, indicating a good baseline security posture. It uses reputable analytics and advertising services with consent management. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in security governance and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear company contact information including support emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Turistika.cz s.r.o.
Description
Zkušení turisté a cestovatelé zde sdílí své zážitky a zkušenosti z cest formou tipů na výlet, tras, cestopisů a popisem zajímavých turistických cílů nebo své dovolené. Odměnou jim je pomoc ostatním turistům svými zkušenostmi a část peněz z reklamy našich partnerů, která se zobrazí u jejich článků.
Key services
travel tips, trip routes, travelogues, tourist destination descriptions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, Google Fonts (News Cycle), Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Gemius, Google Adsense
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Gemius
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Revive Adserver, Gemius, RTB House
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and detailed cookie information is provided.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers were found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple external domains are used for analytics, advertising, and content delivery.
  7. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  8. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data; recommend adding them.
  9. No evidence of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Analytics are handled via Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Gemius, indicating a robust data collection framework. The CMS appears to be Nette based on CSS paths. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site includes multiple external domains for advertising and tracking, which are managed with user consent. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly website but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with turistika.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review turistika.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.