Skip to main content

Security report for tsnj.cz

Technické služby města Nového Jičína · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Technické služby města Nového Jičína is a municipal service organization providing essential public services such as maintenance of local roads, public lighting, waste management, green area upkeep, and cemetery administration primarily for the city of Nový Jičín and its surroundings. Established in 2006, it operates as a contributory organization serving both citizens and local businesses. The website reflects a well-structured digital presence with clear service descriptions and multiple contact channels, targeting local residents and public entities. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and provides relevant certifications and legal documents to enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsnj.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a stable market position as a local government service provider with a medium-sized operational scale. Its business model focuses on municipal asset management and public service delivery, supported by a transparent communication strategy via its website. The presence of career opportunities and public announcements indicates active community engagement and operational transparency. Partnerships with local government and service providers are implied but not explicitly detailed. The company leverages digital tools for citizen interaction and service requests, indicating moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published incident response policy or security contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a municipal service website but could be improved with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response policy and provide a security contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Technické služby města Nového Jičína, příspěvková organizace
VAT number
CZ00417688
Registration number
00417688
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Technické služby města Nového Jičína
Description
Technické služby města Nového Jičína zajišťují správu a údržbu majetku města, služby pro občany a podnikatele v Novém Jičíně a okolí, včetně správy komunikací, veřejné zeleně, odpadového hospodářství, správy budov, hřbitovů a veřejného osvětlení.
Key services
Místní komunikace, tržnice, veřejné parkoviště, Veřejná zeleň a veřejně prospěšné práce, Odpadové hospodářství a ekologie, Správa budov, hřbitovů, veřejných WC a osvětlení, Veřejná služba a veřejně prospěšné práce
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Helix Ultimate Framework, Smart Slider 3, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Analytics, Flickity Carousel
Frameworks
Helix Ultimate
Platforms
Joomla CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms protected with CAPTCHA

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a municipal service provider for Nový Jičín city.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at local citizens and businesses.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and contact forms are provided.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with clear notice.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Website uses Joomla CMS with Helix Ultimate template and various JS libraries.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS using the Helix Ultimate framework, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity, and Smart Slider 3 for interactive UI components. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes basic SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility. Hosting is managed via REG-ACTIVE24 with DNS servers at websupport.cz, consistent with Czech hosting providers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsnj.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsnj.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.