Skip to main content

Security report for tsk.sk

Trenčiansky samosprávny kraj · Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trenčiansky samosprávny kraj operates as the regional government authority for the Trenčín region in Slovakia, providing a comprehensive online portal for residents and stakeholders. The website offers extensive information on governance, healthcare, social services, education, transport, culture, finance, and regional development. It serves as a central hub for official announcements, electronic services, and public engagement through social media channels. The portal targets local citizens and professionals seeking regional administrative information and services. Technically, the website is built on the BUXUS CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies such as jQuery, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and includes accessibility features, though these could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of key scripts and a structured navigation system. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, along with reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which are recommended for transparency and security maturity. Overall, the website is legitimate, well-branded, and trustworthy as a government portal. It provides valuable public services and information but could improve privacy compliance and security posture by adding explicit policies and technical safeguards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsk.sk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention tsk.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
75
Employees
0
Customers
71
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
53%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for tsk.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Trenčiansky samosprávny kraj website positions itself as the authoritative regional government portal for the Trenčín region in Slovakia. It leverages a government-backed business model focused on public service delivery and transparency. The portal supports multiple sectors including healthcare, social assistance, education, transport, culture, finance, and regional development, indicating a broad service scope. The presence of electronic services and public tenders suggests digital transformation efforts. The site integrates with partner domains such as regional tourism and job portals, enhancing its ecosystem. The business model relies on government funding and public engagement rather than commercial revenue streams. The website's consistent branding and comprehensive content support its role as a trusted regional authority.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. The use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate automated abuse on forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. There is no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for responsible security management. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Trenčiansky samosprávny kraj
Description
Tento portál je primárne určený pre obyvateľov vyššieho územného celku, trenčianskeho regiónu. Informuje o veciach samosprávy, ale aj o kultúrno-spoločenskom dianí v regióne.
Key services
Information about regional governance, News and announcements, Access to official documents and tenders, Contact and social media engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.0, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Fonts (Sarala, Jaldi), jQuery UI 1.10.3, Custom JavaScript and CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Facebook SDK loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
GTranslate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official regional government website for Trenčiansky samosprávny kraj in Slovakia.
  2. Provides comprehensive public information and electronic services across multiple sectors.
  3. Uses HTTPS and standard web technologies with moderate performance.
  4. Includes cookie consent banner and social media integration.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled in the content snippet.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the BUXUS CMS platform with a technology stack including jQuery 2.1.0, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Fonts. It uses CSS frameworks like normalize.css and cutegrids.css for layout and styling. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a clear navigation structure. However, the site could improve SEO by adding more comprehensive meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic, with some skip links and ARIA roles but could be enhanced. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and improved performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsk.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsk.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.