Skip to main content

Security report for tseg.com

TSEG · Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TSEG is a specialized digital marketing agency focused on providing web design, SEO, and PPC services tailored for law firms nationwide. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of its services and target audience. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, Bootstrap framework, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising platforms such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Reddit Ads. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is minimal with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a gap for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is functional and well-structured but would benefit from improved transparency and contact information to boost trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tseg.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TSEG operates in the niche market of legal digital marketing, targeting law firms across the United States. Their business model centers on providing specialized marketing services including SEO, PPC, and web design, positioning themselves as experts in the legal sector. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized agency with a focused service offering. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data and contact details limits full business intelligence but the presence of professional branding and marketing tools suggests a legitimate operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes security best practices such as reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of comprehensive security headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is noted. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site lacks published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are recommended for enhanced security maturity. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, representing compliance risks especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize potential security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TSEG
Description
Let TSEG run your Law Firm's digital marketing campaign. We offer web design, SEO and PPC services for law firms nationwide. Contact us to get started!
Key services
web design, SEO, PPC services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Ads Pixel, reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Yoast SEO (JSON-LD structured data), Bootstrap 5.0.2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional
  2. No WHOIS data publicly available, possibly privacy protected or unregistered
  3. Professional digital marketing agency for law firms
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in content
  7. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Reddit Ads, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for performance optimization. Meta tags and JSON-LD structured data are well implemented for SEO. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning for faster load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tseg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tseg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.