Skip to main content

Security report for tsc-spectre.cz

TSC Spectre, s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TSC Spectre, s.r.o. operates as the central administrative and support entity within the TSC Group holding, providing comprehensive economic, legal, personnel, administrative, and IT services to its subsidiaries. The company emphasizes quality management, ISO certification support, and ESG initiatives, positioning itself as a key enabler of operational excellence within the group. Their market presence spans multiple countries including the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany, Poland, and Hungary, serving a large client base with a workforce exceeding 7,000 employees. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Swiper.js, with responsive design and good SEO practices, although some security headers are missing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the professional content and detailed contact information mitigate this risk. Overall, the company demonstrates a mature business model with strong compliance and quality focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsc-spectre.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is a large holding support entity founded in 1997, serving as the backbone for 12 subsidiaries under TSC Group. It leverages ISO certifications and ESG commitments to differentiate itself in the cleaning and technical services sector. Revenue streams include centralized financial management, personnel services, quality control, and environmental management. The target customers are primarily corporate clients and subsidiaries within the group, with a strong regional footprint. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with sister companies and related domains. Growth indicators include ongoing ISO certification expansions and investments in sustainability projects. The business model focuses on centralized service provision to optimize operational efficiency across the group.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, secure contact forms protected by reCaptcha, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a missed opportunity for responsible vulnerability management. GDPR compliance is evident through consent checkboxes and privacy policy links. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Continue investing in privacy compliance measures and ensure cookie consent mechanisms are fully transparent and user-friendly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TSC Spectre, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ05592968
Registration number
C 68263
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TSC Spectre, s.r.o.
Description
TSC Spectre, s.r.o. is the central administration and support company of the TSC Group holding. It provides economic, legal, personnel, administrative, and IT support to all subsidiaries. It also manages ISO certifications and ESG initiatives. The company offers comprehensive financial services, accounting, tax advisory, safety and environmental management, and quality control services for the group.
Key services
Financial management, treasury, controlling, and reporting, Personnel and payroll support, ISO certification support, Safety and environmental management (BOZP, PO, environmental management), Quality control system QuaCheck, RFID-based laundry tracking system
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, Nette Framework (form validation), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with reCaptcha v3
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  3. Strong presence of ISO certifications and ESG initiatives.
  4. Comprehensive contact information including phone, email, physical address, and contact form with GDPR consent.
  5. Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data; recommend improvement.
  7. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  8. Multiple related domains linked, representing subsidiaries and partner companies.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and service focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Swiper.js for carousels and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The presence of Nette Framework form validation scripts indicates a PHP-based backend framework. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not available. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture. Opportunities exist to enhance security and domain management practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsc-spectre.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsc-spectre.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.