Skip to main content

Security report for tsc-marketing.com

TSC Marketing, s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TSC Marketing, s.r.o. is a marketing and communication company serving as the centralized marketing arm for the TSC Group holding. The company focuses on brand building, managing online and offline campaigns, internal communications, public relations, HR marketing, and event management. It supports the entire TSC Group, which is a leading provider of cleaning and technical services in the Czech Republic. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Nette Framework for form validation, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCaptcha protection on forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some trust concerns despite the professional appearance and business legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe, business-focused, and well-structured, but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching tsc-marketing.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates within the marketing and communications sector, specifically servicing a large holding group with multiple subsidiaries. Its business model is focused on centralized marketing support, brand management, and communication strategy execution for the TSC Group. The target audience includes internal stakeholders and business clients within the holding. The company benefits from the strong market position of TSC Group, the largest in its sector in the Czech Republic. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a clear organizational structure and multiple related subsidiaries. The presence of ISO certification and professional content suggests a mature business with a focus on quality and compliance. The partnership ecosystem is well defined with multiple sister companies linked via the website.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCaptcha on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces trust and may indicate privacy protection or data retrieval issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Improve accessibility features to enhance compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Clarify WHOIS registration details or ensure domain registration data is publicly available to improve trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TSC Marketing, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ14215748
Registration number
142 15 748
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TSC Marketing, s.r.o.
Description
Marketingové a komunikační zastoupení TSC Group. Centralizuje marketingové aktivity skupiny TSC Group, spravuje značku, připravuje a realizuje komunikační strategii, pečuje o weby a sociální sítě, interní komunikaci a public relations, organizuje firemní akce a poskytuje podporu obchodnímu týmu.
Key services
Brand building, On-line i off-line kampaně, Interní komunikace a public relations, HR marketing a event management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, Bootstrap (modal, buttons), Nette Framework (form validation JS), HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Form uses reCaptcha key (Google reCaptcha v3)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not found in the registry, which is unusual.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and includes Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple contact methods.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked from footer.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  7. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  8. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, Swiper.js for carousel functionality, and Nette Framework for form validation. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses semantic HTML5 and CSS3. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags. The contact form collects personal data with reCaptcha protection, indicating attention to spam prevention. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with tsc-marketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review tsc-marketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.