a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 19 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
29
Not counted
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention trustforsikring.dk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for trustforsikring.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates as an insurance and pension agency in Denmark, focusing on providing optimized insurance solutions to businesses. Its business model is based on acting as an intermediary to leverage volume purchasing advantages. The target market includes Danish companies across various sectors. The website indicates a small-sized business with a local market focus. The partnership with multiple insurers and pension funds suggests a broad product offering. The company appears to maintain a professional digital presence but lacks visible certifications or trust badges. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and may warrant further investigation. The company uses standard marketing and analytics tools to support customer engagement and business insights.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible security or incident response policies are provided, and there is no vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations, especially given the lack of cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better header implementation, privacy compliance, and transparency.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Provide clear security and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Review and verify domain WHOIS information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Trust forsikring
Description
Forsikringsagentur med mange års erfaring, der tilbyder forsikrings- og pensionsløsninger til virksomheder, med fokus på optimerede løsninger, stordriftsfordele og samarbejde med flere forsikringsselskaber og pensionskasser.
Key services
Forsikring, Pensionsløsninger, Skadeanmeldelse, Kundesupport og rådgivning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, Dynamicweb 9 CMS, Material Icons, Quicksand font, Open Sans font
Frameworks
Dynamicweb 9
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No visible exposed sensitive data
Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a GDPR compliance gap.
Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
Website uses modern tracking and analytics tools but lacks transparency on data privacy.
No visible security policy or incident response information.
Website content is in Danish and targets Danish businesses.
No forms with personal data collection detected on the homepage.
No social media links found on the site.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with trustforsikring.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trustforsikring.dk.