Skip to main content

Security report for trulia.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.trulia.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page requiring captcha verification to confirm human access. This security measure blocks automated access and prevents retrieval of actual website content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS query for the domain returned no registration data, indicating either an issue with the query or privacy protection, which limits the ability to verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Consequently, no privacy policies, contact information, or business details could be extracted from the provided data. The technical infrastructure includes PerimeterX security scripts and Google Fonts, but no other technologies or CMS platforms are detectable. Due to the blocking, the website's security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility cannot be properly assessed, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching trulia.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS data, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain name 'trulia.com' is known externally as a real estate listing platform, but this analysis cannot confirm current operational status or business model from the provided data. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The blocking by PerimeterX suggests a high-security posture on the front end, likely to protect against bots and scraping. Without access to the actual site content, no insights on market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments are available.

Security posture

The presence of PerimeterX WAF indicates a proactive security approach to mitigate automated threats and abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers, SSL configuration details, or published security policies limits the assessment of overall security maturity. The absence of contact channels for incident response or vulnerability disclosure further constrains evaluation. The domain's WHOIS data absence raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture appears focused on perimeter defense but lacks publicly available security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Ensure website content is accessible to legitimate users without excessive blocking to allow proper indexing and analysis.
  3. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently to demonstrate compliance and build user trust.
  4. Add security headers and SSL configuration details to enhance security posture and protect users.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

PerimeterX detected. The page is blocked by PerimeterX WAF with a captcha challenge requiring user interaction to confirm human presence. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
PerimeterX, Roboto Google Fonts

Analytics and tracking

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PerimeterX

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to PerimeterX WAF blocking with captcha challenge.
  2. No actual website content or metadata available for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the provided HTML.
  4. No contact information or business details found in the HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy assessment.
  6. External resources are mostly related to PerimeterX security services and Google Fonts.
  7. No social media or marketing/advertising scripts detected beyond security scripts.
  8. Website cannot be properly evaluated for SEO, accessibility, or performance due to blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure is heavily reliant on PerimeterX for bot mitigation and security challenges. The use of Google Fonts indicates standard web font usage. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The site is currently inaccessible, preventing performance, SEO, accessibility, or mobile optimization assessments. The blocking mechanism reduces the ability to analyze technical debt or modernization opportunities. The site would benefit from improved transparency and accessibility balanced with security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with trulia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review trulia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.