Skip to main content

Security report for truffle.one

Other · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

60/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website truffle.one is currently inaccessible due to a database connection error, resulting in no visible content or business information. The domain is registered with Cronon GmbH in Germany since 2019, indicating a legitimate registration. However, the lack of accessible content prevents a full assessment of the company's business model, services, or market position. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detected CMS, scripts, or security headers, and no HTTPS information is available, indicating poor security posture. From a security perspective, the site lacks basic protections such as HTTPS, security headers, and visible privacy or cookie policies. The database error represents a critical availability issue that must be resolved to restore service. No WAF or security challenge mechanisms are detected, confirming that the site is down due to backend failure rather than intentional blocking. Overall, the website's risk is elevated due to unavailability and lack of security best practices. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, but the absence of content and security controls significantly reduces trustworthiness and business credibility. Immediate remediation of the database issue and implementation of HTTPS and security headers are critical to improve the site's security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truffle.one

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention truffle.one, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for truffle.one right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website's inaccessibility, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the site content. The domain is registered in Germany with a reputable registrar and hosting provider, suggesting a small to medium-sized business entity. No information about market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact information or policies further limits insights into the company's operations or customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is currently poor. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. The database connection error indicates backend instability, which could be exploited if not properly managed. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations based on available data.

Recommendations

  1. Restore database connectivity immediately to make the website accessible.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data in transit.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently down due to a database connection error
  2. No visible content or business information available on the homepage
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or forms present
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available
  6. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain registration with Cronon GmbH in Germany
  7. No external links or social media profiles detected in the HTML content
  8. No scripts or technologies detected due to minimal HTML content
  9. Website is not protected by a WAF or security challenge but is inaccessible due to backend failure
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML error page indicating a database connection failure. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is provided by Cronon GmbH in Germany. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, and no external scripts or analytics tools are present. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical debt is high given the critical backend failure and missing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truffle.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truffle.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.