Skip to main content

Security report for truata.com

Trūata Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Trūata Limited is a UK-based technology company specializing in privacy-enhancing data analytics solutions. Their offerings include anonymization services, privacy risk assessments, and privacy-compliant analytics platforms designed to help businesses extract value from data while maintaining compliance with global data protection regulations. The company targets enterprises and organizations seeking to leverage data securely and ethically, positioning itself as a leader in privacy technology with notable partnerships including IBM, Microsoft Azure, and Mastercard. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, supporting a positive user experience and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integrations of marketing and analytics tools such as Adobe Analytics and HubSpot, and hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of enabled TLS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability that undermines secure communications and user trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and GDPR-aligned consent mechanisms. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistent registration history. Overall, while the business and content quality are strong, urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security are necessary to elevate the site's security and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
30/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching truata.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
30
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Trūata operates in the technology sector with a focus on privacy-enhancing technologies, serving medium-sized to large enterprises. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS platforms and consulting services that enable clients to manage data privacy risks and comply with regulations such as GDPR. The company has established a strong partnership ecosystem with major technology and financial services firms, enhancing its market credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for software platforms, professional services, and custom analytics solutions. The website content and partnerships indicate a mature and stable business with a clear growth trajectory in the privacy technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with appropriate HTTP security headers and a strict DMARC policy to prevent email spoofing. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and undermine trust. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The site uses modern consent management tools (OneTrust) and analytics with privacy considerations, reflecting a privacy-aware culture. To improve, the company should prioritize SSL/TLS remediation, publish security policies, and enhance incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and implement OCSP stapling and session resumption for performance and security.
  3. Enhance HSTS policy by including subdomains and preload directives to strengthen transport security.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end using jQuery and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Adobe Analytics and HubSpot. Hosting is provided by Microsoft Azure, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with caching enabled via Hummingbird and Redis Object Cache. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich search results. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The critical technical risk is the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which must be addressed to avoid security breaches and loss of user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with truata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review truata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.