Skip to main content

Security report for troinex.ch

Mairie de Troinex · Government · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website troinex.ch serves as the official digital presence for the commune of Troinex in Switzerland, providing residents and visitors with comprehensive information about municipal services, local news, events, environmental initiatives, and administrative procedures. The site targets local citizens and stakeholders, offering a user-friendly platform to access government resources and community updates. The business model is that of a government entity focused on public service and community engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Gravity Forms for data collection, and analytics tools including Matomo, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices, although hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements cookie consent mechanisms, and uses nonce tokens in forms to prevent CSRF attacks. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, troinex.ch is a trustworthy and professional government website with high content quality and user experience. It complies with GDPR requirements and provides clear contact information. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response details, and adopting additional security headers to strengthen the security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching troinex.ch

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Troinex.ch positions itself as a local government authority website serving the commune of Troinex. Its competitive advantage lies in providing centralized, accessible information and services tailored to its residents. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public administration and community support. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government entity. The target customer segment includes local residents, businesses, and visitors seeking municipal information. Growth indicators include active content updates, event announcements, and community engagement via social media. The partnership ecosystem includes links to solidarity initiatives and local service providers. The website reflects a stable operational presence with a focus on transparency and service delivery.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and cookie consent compliance. Use of nonce tokens in forms indicates attention to input security. Analytics and tracking scripts are present but managed with user consent. The absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts represents a compliance gap. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site would benefit from implementing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for a government site but could be enhanced with formal documentation and proactive disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and handling of security issues.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Consider adopting a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mairie de Troinex
Description
Official website of the commune of Troinex, providing information about local administration, community services, environment, events, and news for residents and visitors.
Key services
Municipal information and services, Community news and events, Environmental and urban planning information, Public safety and emergency contacts, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bootstrap (implied by accordion and nav classes), LazyLoad images
Frameworks
WordPress, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms (Gravity Forms)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Matomo, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained official municipal site for Troinex, Switzerland.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and localized in French.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  8. No terms of service page found, which is common for government sites.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and Gravity Forms for user input. It integrates multiple analytics tools such as Matomo, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a comprehensive approach to user behavior analysis. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security headers and streamline third-party dependencies. Hosting details are not explicit, which could be clarified for operational transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with troinex.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review troinex.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.